Yep very much so, as non-whites breed at a higher rate than whites do in this country by far.
When I was at school only a few decades ago, almost every fellow pupil was white, and every single one of them spoke English as their native language.
The all encompassing BNP thread - keep all crap in here.
- Thread starter Stolly
- Start date
Yep very much so, as non-whites breed at a higher rate than whites do in this country by far.
When I was at school only a few decades ago, almost every fellow pupil was white, and every single one of them spoke English as their native language.
What a silly and laughable straw man
It only takes one or two non English speakers in a class to disrupt your child's schooling significantly.
You do look rather foolish trying to pretend the BNP has not got stronger this last week
Several county councillors elected, a first ever for nationalist politics in the UK.
Two MEPs elected, a massive breakthrough for nationalism in the UK.
How ironic. It's not Dolph who looks foolish.
And yet you clearly didn't receive much of an education if the BNP floats your political boat.
It is an increasing problem, but not on the scale originally claimed. Your newspaper articles refer only to the number of school children who do not speak English as their first language. This means they do speak English (albeit as a second language). Furthermore, they are not all in the one place; they represent a wider demographic spread throughout the nation.
See above. I asked for the names of six state schools in this country where English is not spoken as the first language. This article does nothing to answer that question.
Last edited:
And yet you looked foolish earlier.
Are we having a political debate now? Feels like it.
Forgot this was GD?
I do plan on going into more detail, but later, when I'm not at work.
The green party increased their share of the vote by nearly double that of the BNP, and yet they are still a fringe party.
Why should the BNP be given extra publicity/Credence over the greens, who garnered a greater share of the vote, and the same number of MEPs
You are making much more of the BNP's gains than is justified by the size of them, they should be treated the same as other fringe parties with small representation, because they are the same. A small increase in their support, tipping them just over the level needed to gain some representation, doesn't change that.
Being at work evidently isn't stopping you posting. Nobody is looking for a 'fight', there are two sides here who are engaged in a hopefully civil discussion and debate
You didn't think my post was funny, so perhaps I let the side down in terms of my sense of humour, but I don't think that is comparable in terms of foolishness with having political views grounded in racism, broken logic and hate.
What a silly and laughable straw man
It's not a straw man. You clearly do not know what a straw man is. A straw man is a false argument used to misrepresent an opponent's position. I simply asked a question, and I am still waiting for it to be answered.
But even the newspaper articles presented do not refer to non-English speaking pupils. They refer to English speaking pupils for whom English is not their first language.
Associate
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 944
Exactly it is a problem that is spreading across our country, and the last link i believe stated that one in three couldn't speak English as their first language, do you honestly believe this will not have an impact on the education of the others in that school/area as more resources are drained away in trying to make up for this deficiency?
Protest vote against expenses. More people are comfortable voting for the Green party than the BNP, due to the zero media coverage of the former and the overwhelmingly negative and hostile coverage of the latter.
So why are the votes for the greens protest votes but the votes for the BNP a sign of a breakthrough? Especially as both BNP MEPs have been gained at the expense of Labour?
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,371
- Location
- Northumberland
Depending on who you speak to on here you will get 2 different answers. The BNP policy is to assist people who are either illegally in the country or who do not wish to be in the country to leave by giving them £2000 towards their repatriation to their conuntry of origin. They will not force people to leave.
I don't think anyone would suggest the BNP is a party for equal rights though.
I don't think people would vote BNP unless they had some sympathy with at least some of their policies. If they had no sympathy with the BNP at all but were furious over expenses, they would vote Green or some other small party to protest. Therefore I think we can conclude that the BNP's rise is genuine and the increased share of the vote is due to the deterioration of our society due to mass immigration and the failed policies of LibLabCon.
As we've seen from discussions on here, many people are not even aware of the party's aims and constitution, so I don't think you can assume that in the slightest. The logic employed above is a classic example of wishful thinking.
We all know the BNP is portrayed as the bogeyman of British politics.