Which would actually make them an even more attractive protest vote if you want to 'stick it to the man'...
The all encompassing BNP thread - keep all crap in here.
- Thread starter Stolly
- Start date
Which would actually make them an even more attractive protest vote if you want to 'stick it to the man'...
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,371
- Location
- Northumberland
No I agree, but having made serious inroads into UK politics I don't think they would want to commit political suicide or have sanctions against the country they want to restore ala apartheid South Africa. If the BNP want to be taken seriously then they have to encourage Britishness in all people in this country, unfortunately there is a hardline who will never embrace this country as their own and will leech from it and cause dissent.
Dirtydog, you are very much mistaken if you think that.
The people who I know that have voted BNP are either:
a) Uneducated
b) Think it's a good idea to follow the media hype / crowd
c) Have no other political interests
d) Read the Sun
I'm sure there are some very intellectual individuals that know and understand BNP's policies that have calculated that voting for them will make this country more efficient, productive and a better place to be... but I don't know who they are.
The people who I know that have voted BNP are either:
a) Uneducated
b) Think it's a good idea to follow the media hype / crowd
c) Have no other political interests
d) Read the Sun
I'm sure there are some very intellectual individuals that know and understand BNP's policies that have calculated that voting for them will make this country more efficient, productive and a better place to be... but I don't know who they are.
What category do you think I fall into?
Associate
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 2,211
It doesn't matter whether it's correct or not.
"non-whites breed"?
What the **** please. You disgust me. That statement is just... unbelievable. That's the sort of thing the Nazis said. I bet you've got textbooks on eugenics lining your walls and cranial measuring equipment.
Sick human being. I hope you don't have children.
In fairness to DD, he's correct, but he has forgot the caveats of the statistic.
First generation immigrants tend to have a higher birth rate than those born here, and this takes about 3 generations to normalise, which in turn means that non-white immigrants have a higher birth rate than white natives by birth. However, they also have a higher birth rate than non-white natives by birth, so the actual solution is that this isn't a problem, as people acclimatise to the British way of life, their birth rate drops to the same as someone who was born in britian.
The only way the stat is scary is if you have some sort of paranoia that visible racial differences (ie skin colour) have a tangible effect on society and therefore there is some benefit in controlling the racial makeup of society...
"Hitler can't be blamed". Crikey...
I'm starting to learn a bit more about the way you think now.
And yet you vote for the BNP? Do I even need to point out why that's ridiculous?
Because their policies (or lack thereof) are appalling and it's even more appalling that people are taken in by their lies.
So it is the use of the word 'breed' you have an issue with? Whites breed at a lower rate than non whites do - a factual statement. I have no idea why you are getting so upset about it
Associate
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 2,211
So it is the use of the word 'breed' you have an issue with? Whites breed at a lower rate than non whites do - a factual statement. I have no idea why you are getting so upset about it
You talk about people from different ethnic backgrounds as if they're some sort of vermin. That's why I'm getting so upset about it.
Racism in any guise is not ****ing on. These are other human beings you're talking about.
And just for clarity.
Supports my point, and also the acknowledged bias in the study that says how the figures are affected by demographics.
Which suggests that race doesn't actually impact the birth rates as such, but that demographics with younger populations are more likely to have kids...
Associate
- Joined
- 30 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 2,211
No, they don't use the term 'breeding'.
Maybe your the problem then because you are certainly inferring something from DD's posts that isn't there !
He has made a statement, backed up by fact that non-white's breed at a higher rate than whites.
Quite ironic that you are putting yourself up there as morally correct yet try to refute his posts by insulting him.
it is scary though..its scary that people would vote for a party on the anniversary of the invasion of europe to stop this sort of thing...that millions died to fight fascism and now as the veterans of this war dwindle, people are quick to forget what is was about..that tens of thousands of people from around the world fought alongside each other regardless of colour or ethnicity in the british army and now this country would repatriate their descendants for being the wrong colour
its sickening to be honest..it shows a staggering lack of respect and decency and a huge amount of ignorance, and to be honest petty spite. Spite and bile from people who in the main do as little for this country as some of the people they lay the blame for their woes upon.
I agree with you entirely, my point was that on that point, DD deserved some defending, because he wasn't wrong. His point was incomplete (which may be because of his biases and the points he wishes to get across) but on that point, he didn't deserve the blasting he got.