Behold, My New Jaguar XJ8, in pictures.

That average of 25.7mpg given the small engine and the lightweight body doesnt seem too impressive though? Perhaps it has been driven relatively hard for this class of car?

Its not that bad I think - as a comparison, my e36 328i is showing 28.4mpg on its "Consum1" display which I last reset about a month ago and 25.7 on "Consum2" which I have not reset since I bought the car about 4 months ago.

Given the larger size of that Jag & what I'd imagine to be its better performance (I'll have to check the figures!) its ok I think. :)
 
What i mean is that generally you would not drive a luxury saloon in the same way you would a 3-series (or even a BMW in general).

As a comparison my heavier older 4.3 s-class is showing 26.1 average over the last ~3000miles, and achieves 28-30mpg on any run longer than around 50miles. With this newer smaller engine and lightweight ally body i would fully expect a consistent 30mpg+ on a run and getting towards 30mpg average.

As i say though, we have no clue how it has been driven. A few blasts would see the averages tumble :)
 
As i say though, we have no clue how it has been driven. A few blasts would see the averages tumble :)

True enough, when I test drove the 328i it had a flat battery which was duly jump started giving me in effect a reset OBC, one "test drive" later and it was reading sub 8mpg! - the same figure thats now built up over time to read 25.7 :o :D
 
Well I have clocked up around 115 miles of varied driving today, including motorways, A roads and lots of twisting winding B roads and a bit of stop start around town stuff. I've been reading 22mpg average on that. I suppose it might be possible to get 30mpg if I stayed cruising on a motorway for long enough. I got this economy with a few foot to the floor blasts and a bit of J-gate manual use :D ...but mostly normal driving.

The average on trip B has fallen now I've got the car actually :p

The economy of the 3.5 (why do they call it a 3.5, it's actually 3,555cc, so if you round it it's 3.6) is actually supposed to be within 1mpg on average of the 4.2. There really isn't an advantage to the 3.5, it was just a case of that's what this car has and I couldn't find a 4.2 with the rest of the spec I wanted, well I couldn't find a 4.2 Sport basically, not one I wanted to buy anyway.

I'm still surprised by the performance of this car, it's no hot-rod off the line, but once it's moving it goes quite well indeed (probably because I was expecting it to feel a bit steady tbh), put your foot down from 30mph and it'll hit 70mph faster than either of my sixes would I'm sure, the real differences comes in beyond that point though, keep your foot down and it carries on accelerating at the same rate, at 100mph I took my foot off the accelerator and just cruised back down to 75, since I want to keep my license. The BMW and the ST220 wouldn't pull past 70mph that effortlessly, they'd easily do that, no problems at all, but not with such an effortless breeze of acceleration as the big Jag, both felt like they were working much harder. What a lovely car is all I can say so far, I'm enjoying it a lot, I'm probably driving more slowly though, on th whole, as a result of the car wanting to cruise more than set my hair on fire.

Also, being a post 2003 Sport, it has the CATS suspension fitted, so it handles rather better than you might think when you grab it by the scruff of the neck, put the gear box into manual mode and pretend it's a 330CI or something :D ...ok so at times today I was thinking ohhh I shouldn't be going this fast into this corner, this isn't going to work, thinking I'm doing 20mph less than I actually am, it's hugely deceptive, I'm finding myself going faster than I think a lot of the time, I'll get used to that though, well I already am now I've clocked up a few miles in it, I think.

Jez; your merc is the 4.3 right? ...well I had a look at the figurs for that car, performance is pretty much identical to the 3.5 Jag actually, due to the fairly considerable extra weight the S class is carrying, the Jag 4.2 is quite a bit quicker on paper than the 4.3 Merc.

The one thing above all that strikes me about the Jag, is how comfortable it is, so smooth and cosseting, and I thought my 330CI with it's rock hard run-flats and M-tech sports suspension was quite comfortable when I first had it, well not really, not even close. I suppose it was comapred to my prior small hatches though.
 
Last edited:
The one thing above all that strikes me about the Jag, is how comfortable it is, so smooth and cosseting, and I thought my 330CI with it's rock hard run-flats and M-tech sports suspension was quite comfortable when I first had it, well not really, not even close. I suppose it was comapred to my prior small hatches though.


Theres one thing you cant do, you cant compaire a Jag to a BMW, its a completly different ball point, its like up cider up to a larger. Personally I'd rather have the smooth sweet powerful taste of cider than the harsher more popular taste of larger.
Your current MPG is a little worrying, but then again its gonna be like this, no doubt you've been using your foot quite a lot. I remeber Clarkson getting 24MPG out the XJR to scotland. Yours should easy pull average of 26MPG.
Hope your enjoying the XJ.
 
Jez; your merc is the 4.3 right? ...well I had a look at the figurs for that car, performance is pretty much identical to the 3.5 Jag actually, due to the fairly considerable extra weight the S class is carrying, the Jag 4.2 is quite a bit quicker on paper than the 4.3 Merc.

The one thing above all that strikes me about the Jag, is how comfortable it is, so smooth and cosseting, and I thought my 330CI with it's rock hard run-flats and M-tech sports suspension was quite comfortable when I first had it, well not really, not even close. I suppose it was comapred to my prior small hatches though.

Indeed its the "baby" (for the range) V8, seems quite a good engine really in terms of a compromise between power and performance, as you have highlighted with your comparison of pace between yours and the 330ci they all (V8 luxury cars, regardless of peak hp) pull miles better than other cars which on paper seem nearly as quick with smaller engines - lack of torque i guess. I dont think that you have done a bad thing getting the 3.5/6 over the 4.2, it sounds punchy enough and should as you get used to it provide reasonable economy.

Lol about the 330ci comments, that'll feel like an elise if you ever got to go in one again after the jag. I had a 530 sport recently and i found myself razzing around in that like a hooligan due to its go-kartiness in comparison to the merc :D
 
It's already depreciated something like £37k at a guess, I'm guessing it was about £48k new. The first owner paid the vast bulk of that, I won't :p
 
Back
Top Bottom