Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2002
- Posts
- 16,379
- Location
- 38.744281°N 104.846806°W
Not really. X-rays, plaque staining, scaling, polishing etc. 5 mins? No ta.5 minutes is long enough for a checkup; 30 minutes is a complete waste of time.
Not really. X-rays, plaque staining, scaling, polishing etc. 5 mins? No ta.5 minutes is long enough for a checkup; 30 minutes is a complete waste of time.
So with a sample size of just 3, we have 2 failures and 1 success. Do you not see my point?
My pet hate was NHS dentistry. My last checkup was TWO MINUTES. I wrote a letter of complaint and then went private. Where my checkups last THIRTY MINUTES for only double the cost.
Would you smile for me, please? Thanks. Point made.
Point not made because my teeth are fine and I'm not embarrassed by them as you infer.
I just can't picture you smiling at all tbh.![]()
I get all that on my NHS dentist every 6 months for £16 thanksNot really. X-rays, plaque staining, scaling, polishing etc. 5 mins? No ta.
The NHS would be a far better institution if we were to get shot of 90% of the useless middle-management paper pushers.
There was an American being interviewed on the BBC just now, criticising the NHS. He said we have to wait six weeks for a dental appointment and "have you seen the state of British teeth?"
Bloody Yanks and their obsession with teeth!
LOL. Only 10% of the UK is fluoridated. I'm in the West Midlands, which is part of that lucky 10%.
I agree here to an extent.
My Wife works for the NHS as an accountant (accounts payable / receivable so not front line but essential just like it is in any company). I worked out the other day she has 7 managers, 3 of which are titled 'Director', 'Assistant Director' and 'Deputy Director'. As far as I can tell, they appear to do very similar roles or in reality they are not directors at all rather, mere section heads. The remaining 4 managers are managers in title only and in the case of my wifes direct line manager is merely a senior version of the same role (albeit paid nearly three times as much based on the pay gradesconfused:?!)).
It seems that the problem with the NHS is more down to the old 'too many chiefs not enough Indians' problem.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8199615.stm
I know it's far from perfect, but compared to the US health system, it's leaps and bounds ahead. The though of even a hint of socialism scares the crap out of a lot of Yanks.
I know a lot of people do the classic British thing of moaning about everything, but is the NHS a fundamental part of the UK or is it really evil?
I for one think the NHS is a lot better than most people give it credit for.
you do know that taxes dont fund our country right? and that taxes are used to pay back the money the money we are initially loaned from the international bankers?
but aside from that, who said i was talking about just ciggaretes and alcahol? im talking about crack, heroin, coca cola and sunny delight.
I meant refused on the basis of being sick too much. Of course they have to ration what healthcare people get, you can't go giving everyone with a headache a full battery of MRI scans.
people are refused treatment in the NHS constantly, are you mad?
You can't get a hip replacement if your hip only hurts you a bit all the time for years, its only when it gets so bad you can't walk anymore. SO rather than fix you up early asap to get you back out and working/living. They wait till it would simply be too morally disgusting to ignore you anymore. WHich often leaves people in a FAR worse condition post surgery than if it had been taken care of earlier.
Most conditions you'll find there are very specific criteria you have to meet, before your condition becomes severe enough to require treatment. Not sure why people think that isn't the case.
You seem to have an idea that in the states you simply walk in and say "my hip hurts me occasionally" and they send you for a repacement just because you want one. It doesn't work like that, and rightly so.