Can anybody help me please in choosing between these two SSD drives ?

Associate
Joined
10 Aug 2009
Posts
46
One has 128mb cache and the other has 64mb cache with both of them selling for around the same price.

Corsair Extreme Series X64 64GB

OCZ 60GB Summit Series 128MB Cache

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Many thanks
 
Neither tbh. For that money you are better off buying the best ssd by miles which is the Intel X25-M IMO.

Good performers to consider if you don't want to spend as much as the Intel would be the G.skill Falcom or the Crucial M225.

The Corsairs are very poor in comparison to any of these listed.
 
Neither tbh. For that money you are better off buying the best ssd by miles which is the Intel X25-M IMO.

Good performers to consider if you don't want to spend as much as the Intel would be the G.skill Falcom or the Crucial M225.

The Corsairs are very poor in comparison to any of these listed.

best ssd by miles is questionable to say the least, in benchmarks in one area, yes, though it loses in many other area's. The question is though, how often does it provide a noticeable difference in performance? Its really an unknown, frankly almost any ssd offers a different feel to windows for almost anything, opening FF/IE, most apps is uber quick and that feel is there on most of the worst ssd's compared to normal ssd's.

In terms of game loading times, the Intel offers nothing over the cheaper drives around, and the INtel nor the Indilix based drives show anything over the latest Samsung controller drives. Infact other than windows load which seems faster as you're loading LOTS of small bits and bobs but only that once, and very database/webserver based usage I doubt you'd know if you had a Crucial or an Intel in your system.

Frankly the Intel seems complete overkill unless you actually do run a webserver from the computer, I've seen very little evidence of a real improvement in speed in any other situation, games, most apps.

I'd buy nothing except the Crucial at the moment even if you have to wait a week for stock.
 
Thanks for the info guys but if you had to pick between the Corsair and OCZ which would you go for ? I can get both at really good prices.

If you really must have one of those then the OCZ hands down.

And to address Drunkenmaster's points, the high iops on the Intel will indeed make no difference to game or app loading times however a lot of other stuff like surfing the net, facebook and windows in general writes random small files to your drive.

However, since it is the same money to one of the drives that the OP is asking to pick from and in most benchmarks the Intel wins hands down, then it is fair to suggest that he should get the Intel.

Tbh if you are buying a ssd drive for your game loading times then you will be disappointed with any of them and would probably do better with a couple of decent 7200rpm drives in raid 0.

But yes, value for money vs performance there is not a drive to touch the crucial atm.
 
Ok thanks, I'm only considering getting a SSD because I like the idea of never having to defrag my computer as well as that snappy feeling it gives to Windows.
 
Thanks for the info guys but if you had to pick between the Corsair and OCZ which would you go for ? I can get both at really good prices.

What kind of price are you talking about, because the Crucial is £100 for the 64gb, which frankly I can't see even a cheap trade price anywhere beating, unless you're talking second hand or, importing or something. The Crucial is essentially a rebranded OCZ drive for a lot cheaper.

Greebo, Surfing might write many small files, but I fail to see how you'll be needing to write any faster than your connection speed is, otherwise what would it be writing, considering we're talking about 5mb/s on the very fastest connections and no ones using that speed web surfing its a non issue.

WebSERVER is the only area related to web use where the intel excel's, and that kind of usage has nothing in any way to do with general web surfing at all.

Theres still only a few benchmarks the Intel wins, it loses as many as it wins. Small random writes are certainly important but its not the be all and end all. The fact your average home user has a hardrive giving 0.5mb random 4kb writes, a Crucial/Ocz will give you closer to 16mb and a Intel will give between 25-40depending on how used the drive is(until trim works on them).

Out of benchmarks I've still not seen any evidence the Intel is actually faster, I've not seen any general use real world apps be so heavy on random 4kb writes that the Intel becomes way faster. Load times, no, content creation, no, copying files, no, surfing the net, no, opening Firefox, no.

An ssd, with no access times and any ability to do decent random read/write is a HUGE improvement.

A Corsair/OCZ/Crucial will easily give great windows performance in many area's and certainly give you the snappy instant feel.

THe corsair has pretty terrible 4kb random write performance, yet in all those same benchmarks it has same load times as the Intel. Random writes, important, yes, 0.5mb enough? not even close, is 5mb enough, is 15mb, I don't know, I just can't see any evidence of real improvement in real world use between the OCZ/Crucial and the Intel, benchmarks, sure, they're designed to do so.
 
Last edited:
I think you're paying more for the name for the Intel. For the fact it uses it's own controller so it should have better support for new firmware and work better. State of the art Intel is always overpriced.
 
I didn't know that OCZ SSD's are rebranded Crucial SSD's. Can I ask where you have seen the Crucial 64GB for £100.

You can see here which is which under the hood. Technically these all have the same components. Base any purchase on price, warranty and support.

Crucial M225
crucial.jpg


ST Ultradrive
ultradrive.jpg


Vertex
vertex.jpg


Falcon
falcon.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom