this is what you call a FPS

Mal X · 14 Sep 2009 at 15:35

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufosqZlXyYA

FEAR 2......the best there is for sheer blood and violence...............so enjoy

i havent played REBORN yet but my mates tell me that it's awesome, this guy must be on Speed...flipping heck what a mess he makes.

SfnX · 14 Sep 2009 at 15:36

mw2 *cough*
next month il be getin section 8, played it at i37 beta was pritty decent.

Davepen · 14 Sep 2009 at 15:38

Fear 2 sucks tbh.
Dumbed down for the consoles

Mal X · 14 Sep 2009 at 15:42

Davepen said:
Fear 2 sucks tbh.
Dumbed down for the consoles

no, it's still totally awesome

Mal X · 14 Sep 2009 at 15:43

Mal X said:
no, it's still totally awesome

the Reborn DLC is much more like the original FEAR

Dark88 · 14 Sep 2009 at 15:47

how long does it take to play through the new DLC?

Shadez · 14 Sep 2009 at 15:51

Davepen said:
Fear 2 sucks tbh.
Dumbed down for the consoles

I wouldnt say its sucks but its definitely dumbed down for consoles.

Mal X · 14 Sep 2009 at 16:06

Dark88 said:
how long does it take to play through the new DLC?

not long, only about 1.5 to 2 hours, but it's only 5 quid so that's ok.

FEAR 2 is definitely dumbed down for consoles, but it's still high octane compared to other shooters...........it's as violent as you want it to be.

e.g he's chosen weapons to generate the maximum gore :cool:

Fenris · 14 Sep 2009 at 16:14

Fear 2 is fine, but not great.

It's generic and it's attempts at horror are aweful.

Deific · 14 Sep 2009 at 16:20

Fear 2 is terrible. I bought it, it sucked. The singleplayer is mediocre, nowhere near as good as Fear 1. As for the multiplayer, don't even bother.

Cutshaw · 14 Sep 2009 at 16:23

I missed FEAR due to MMO addiction but got the second and have yet to finish it. Should I really just get FEAR then? Without too much spoilage, what wasn't in the sequel?

Shadez · 14 Sep 2009 at 16:38

Cutshaw said:
I missed FEAR due to MMO addiction but got the second and have yet to finish it. Should I really just get FEAR then? Without too much spoilage, what wasn't in the sequel?

atmosphere!!!22!!"121

Having just finished replaying the sequel i would say it suffers from the following.

Key binding, you cant use delete or more than 3 mouse buttons
Its sluggish, did you know a supper ace fighter can only run at 1.5 mph, and cant jump more than 30cm.
AI, it just feels wrong.
Rubbish ending, could it be more of a let down.

The only + for the squeal would be the mobile suits. pity you only get to use them for a few min.

Cutshaw · 14 Sep 2009 at 16:43

Ta. FEAR should be dirt cheap now, so I will give it a crack.

Rybo89 · 14 Sep 2009 at 16:46

fear 1 was jumpy as **** for first hour or 2 of playing it then it became very predictable, fear 2 was very predictable from the beginning

never the less i still finished them both, and enjoyed playing them

Mal X · 14 Sep 2009 at 17:48

HA HA ...............oh well, you either love it or you dont

i feel the same about COD and Fallout 3

Teki187 · 14 Sep 2009 at 17:49

Davepen said:
Fear 2 sucks tbh.
Dumbed down for the consoles

So true, shame most pc games are going that way.

Mp4 · 14 Sep 2009 at 17:49

....

Dead space >> FEAR 2

willhub · 14 Sep 2009 at 18:01

Deadspace was awfull, with that view n'all.

Ampeg · 14 Sep 2009 at 18:11

Might give this a look, how could you dumb down a game like Fear though? It wasnt exactly complex to begin with. Enjoyed the first one for a while but the level design became so repetitive, the interesting enemy ai and kinetic and brutal combat kept only kept me interested for so long, really had to force myself to slog on to the finish.

PGdude · 14 Sep 2009 at 18:24

Well, the video sure makes it look special all right.