Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 91,784
- Location
- Falling...
I think it's a shame the guy lost his life as a result of his choice of breaking into the home, but being in the USA he should have known that potential deadly force might have been applied. Unfortunately this often means that the thieves can be armed themselves, so a hit first ask questions later attitude often ensues... however, taking someone's life isn't trivial, and having been faced in a similar situation in the past (no swords or weapons, but I have confronted someone) I know how the fight or flight instincts kick in.
Do I think someone deserves to die for something like this? No.
Do I think that if he hadnt' been in there he'd still be alive today? Yes - therefore he shouldnt' have been in there in the first place.
Do I think that the student is going to be having to cope with the death of someone on his hands for the rest of his life? Yes. No matter how justifiable, taking someone's life so up close is a very heavy burden to bear. Even soldiers in conflict seldom see the whites of the eyes of their enemey in a 1-to-1 scuffle.
I think it's unfair to say whether or not it is justifiable - it probably isn't, but let's face it, the student potentially heard a noise, grabbed something and was taken aback by the alleged "lunge" and instinct took over. It's a tough call.
I'd love to be so forthright as a lot of you and say "hell yeah I'd have cut off his head and **** down his neck" or whatever - but I just couldn't be as tough as that. Sure I can take care of myself and have done in the past and at the time the pain and damage inflicted was inconsequential, however with hindsight I don't for one second feel proud of it and it still haunts me at times.
I think this is an unfortunate situation, it can be argued the thief shouldn't have broken in, but had he done so, and got away, they would have claimed insurance and they'd have beefed up their security and no one would have died. Sure you makes your choices etc... but heck he's still a son, still has family etc... we don't know anything about him.
There is seldom a time where taking someone's life is justifiable.
Do I think someone deserves to die for something like this? No.
Do I think that if he hadnt' been in there he'd still be alive today? Yes - therefore he shouldnt' have been in there in the first place.
Do I think that the student is going to be having to cope with the death of someone on his hands for the rest of his life? Yes. No matter how justifiable, taking someone's life so up close is a very heavy burden to bear. Even soldiers in conflict seldom see the whites of the eyes of their enemey in a 1-to-1 scuffle.
I think it's unfair to say whether or not it is justifiable - it probably isn't, but let's face it, the student potentially heard a noise, grabbed something and was taken aback by the alleged "lunge" and instinct took over. It's a tough call.
I'd love to be so forthright as a lot of you and say "hell yeah I'd have cut off his head and **** down his neck" or whatever - but I just couldn't be as tough as that. Sure I can take care of myself and have done in the past and at the time the pain and damage inflicted was inconsequential, however with hindsight I don't for one second feel proud of it and it still haunts me at times.
I think this is an unfortunate situation, it can be argued the thief shouldn't have broken in, but had he done so, and got away, they would have claimed insurance and they'd have beefed up their security and no one would have died. Sure you makes your choices etc... but heck he's still a son, still has family etc... we don't know anything about him.
There is seldom a time where taking someone's life is justifiable.