• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Good card and a ok price but Nv can beat it

Associate
Joined
30 Apr 2009
Posts
688
Windows 7 already has hardware support for DX11 parts, for file transfers/transcodes, the most common one being if you transfer a movie file to an iPod, it will transcode it there and then using the GPU if you have DX11 parts.

That's just the start - there are umpteen tasks that DX11 GPGPU task offloading can accelerate - anything inherently parallel that someone can be bothered to code for.

It's not just games...
 

Deleted member 66701

D

Deleted member 66701

otherwise what els does ATI have that nividia dont

The "but Ati don't have physx" is a bit of a mute point since ATI adopted OpenCL, which is essentially an open verison of what physx and CUDA does.

Are you going to write code for one architecture or code that can run across both?
 
Associate
Joined
14 Mar 2009
Posts
785
If i was nvidia i'd be more concerned with the 275/285 atm with the 5850 from the few shot i've seen than the 5870.

Could the 2BG 5870 beat the 295 like the 1gb 4870 with the old 260 is the question i'm wondering.
 

AMG

AMG

Soldato
Joined
18 Aug 2008
Posts
4,700
Location
lincs, spalding
Firstly I knew a thread will pop up like this

secondly, are you calling it crap? the GTX295 is a great card, but its not a single card like a HD5870/50 its a daul so if you take that into account the HD5870 is coming close to it and its only a few percent off the X2, just think what happens once ATI sort out the drivers for it and drop the prices a bit.

I m guessing it would be a monster, and I really want to see the X2 varions too. and yes i wanna see nvidias one
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
7,037
Location
Melksham
A single card is as good as a 4870 x2 whihc if good in many repects but with 2.15 billion transisters compared to some 800 million on a single 4870 then that is a lot of DX11 you are paying for but not using although with some Dx10 gain which is good in places.

Its a DX10 part with a load 1.3 billion potenitally wasted trannies but I am sure we will all play DiRT2 because its all there is. OK better AA/AF but it needs games to be here and not just the card.

My complaint is not about the card per se but its only useful for games and no games take advantage of alll but the DX10 part of the game, faster RAM and higher core speeds with some additional wizardry in the core.

Its probably worth £300 to some but there is no DX11 game or other part to compare it to so its just DX10 games that everyone has played or is playing fine on their Dx10 cards presently.

Can you *please* actually know something about what you're talking about in future?

Notably the '1.3 billion wasted transistors' bit, completely forgetting the fact that a good chunk (read >50%) of those 'wasted' transistors go towards giving it almost exactly double the raw processing elements of the 4870 series.

Add on that each of those raw elements has been tweaked with added functionality (yes some of it DX11 based, but not all).

Also added cache (essentially doubled from the 4870).

There's also added functionality on the memory controller/power circuitry in order to both provide protection from overcurrent situations, and to reduce the idle power consumption to 27W (with the second card in crossfire being ~20W).

Of that 1.3 billion transistors probably less than 300 million are purely down to DX11.

Can nvidia beat it, of course they can, they probably will with the GTX3xx whenever that may arrive. Right now though it's the fastest single gpu card by a decent margin, and competes will with the last gen dual gpu cards quite favourably, and it's also cheaper than the GTX295, even taking into account early adopter tax...
 
Associate
Joined
25 Mar 2009
Posts
1,688
Location
Leeds, UK
What people seem to be missing is, this has all the features, this has been the only true future proof card for a while.

i dont see a lot of people upgrading within the next year if they've bought this.
Infact in a year you could pick up another cheap.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
33,188
What I find funny is people automatically assuming Nvidia will beat it, I'm not remotely convinced they will.

The more we here about it the more I think its moved to clusters of SP's, albeit not as significantly as ATi, the last thread had some "info" on it mentioning 16 real cores and 32 logical cores, but that was talking about the lowest end parts, with the high end having 512 "cores" but not listed as logical of physical. its a bad translation and not accurate and nothing to prove anything. But personally I think they've moved from Single SP units, to double SP units, which frankly should be far easier to program for than a full on 5 unit cluster as ATi have. Which would mean 512 logical cores(2 sp's per physical SP unit, of which there would only be 256). Which would give it double the raw horsepower in best case scenario, but not always. The same way ATi's best case scenario in a 4870 blows away a GTX280, but it simply can't provide best case all the time.

THe fact that Nvidia had a huge core and are moving to a horrible process, have higher clock speeds making that issue worse, they need to shrink it and making clusters, as AMD have make it far far lighter on core logic per SP, meaning dramatic saving of transistors.

I simply can't see how they can't have gone this way, as if they double the SP's as suggested, with all the same core logic aswell as add DX11 functionality they will be increasing core size the same as ATi have, which from a circa 500mm^2 core would be, suicide on price.

The fact is, yields are abysmal, size would be ridiculous if it was anywhere from 480-512 real single SP's in a similar architechture and it would be £400-500 just to break even. I can't see that happening in any way shape or form. Considering Nvidia have almost certainly had to drastically change their architechture, you can't really guess at its performance at all.



Frankly whatever Nvidia can provide, I can't see it being close to sub £400, and considering it won't be 2x5850's for the same price, I can't see it being competitive at any level.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
15 Mar 2007
Posts
3,447
It is better than the 285 at around anywhere between 70 quid more expensive to around the same price.

Sure it got low power consumption when idle and thats good and 180W when playing a DX9/10 game. So once again it aint bad and if those trannies are being used for Dx9/10 stuff then cool but its a massive leap from 800 million to 2.15 billion just for DX10 and power requirements.

Its a good card but not a 295 beater which is more expensive so it is well priced and get a good verdict. However it is not amazing, only amazing for the money to be fair. That might be the ATi objective though. Good price/performance especially as it is likely to have a X2 part and a 5850 part to as well as a 2GB version some time and of course cross fire which costs the most.
 
Associate
Joined
30 Apr 2009
Posts
688
Cosmo - hint. Windows 7 uses DX 11 for parts of it's core functionality and usability. Vista will get it too. DX11 Compute Shaders can be used for more than just light renedering, too. Anything that is inherently parallel in nature, such as Photshop filters, large batch resizes, video playback and decoding can benefit from DX11 - which gives developers a much simpler platform to access GPU grunt from which hasn't realistically been available before outside of specialist CUDA and Stream projects.

So for the last time, DirectX 11 is NOT all about games.

Oh, and the 5850 [or the softmodded 5870 made to operate as a 5850, at least] beats the 285 at most things overall, and costs £200. The only £200 285 I can find is the OCUK OEM unit. All the rest are comfortably more expensive, most by more than £50.

Do the research :)
 
Permabanned
Joined
15 Nov 2008
Posts
6,968
Quote from techreports review:

The Radeon HD 5870 is the fastest GPU on the planet, with the best visual output, and the most compelling set of features. Yet it's still a mid-sized chip by GPU standards. As a result, the 5870's power draw, noise levels, and GPU temperatures are all admirably low

Enough said
 
Back
Top Bottom