Fixed.
They have no obligation to honour the price, even if they've taken the money. It will almost certainly be in their T&Cs.
Their T&C's mean absolutely squat if it's in contravention to the consumer rights act and various other laws.
Fixed.
They have no obligation to honour the price, even if they've taken the money. It will almost certainly be in their T&Cs.
If you come here asking for advice, and expect to receive any then I suggest you do care what people here think of you...
It's not great customer service but it's not in breach of any trading law.
It sounds too much like a con to me. Such as offering to sell it well below what they're willing to, in order to trap the customer into a sale he didn't really want to be in. However as they are offering the opportunity to just take the refund, I'd go with that and buy from ocuk instead.
Alternatively you can take this as an invitation to haggle, and you may well get somewhere if you call. At the least you stand a reasonable chance of working out if it was an honest mistake on their part or not.
edit: If the offer of a refund was not on the tables, is it correct to say that they would then be in breach?
If you come here asking for advice, and expect to receive any then I suggest you do care what people here think of you...

If they've accepted your payment and you've recieved an invoice then that's a contract and they should be sending you the goods
The contract is formed when the supplier accepts the offer - if they've used any form of generic online T&Cs the taking of funds does not constitute acceptance.
if you have paid, as in, they have taken the money out of your bank / paypal etc, then they have legally entered into a contract and agreed to supply you that item at that price that they have taken.
If the money has not left your possession, then no contract has been formed as of yet and thus the retailor can decide to decline your offer of purchase.
[FnG]magnolia;15136940 said:The number of responses above which include the phrases "Surely ..?", "I'm almost certain ...", "probably ..." indicate, as always when this type of question which no one knows the definitive answer to, that the OP should speak to someone who can actually guide him rather than give their unqualified opinion.
Speak to the CAB or a solicitor. You know, someone who acutally knows the answer. All of the above is just opinion and therefore next to useless.
Surely If they have taken the money that is an acceptance?
Would this override any obscure clause in their T&C as its legally binding?
Taking payment is automated online - hence T&Cs that will almost certainly state this is not acceptance. Stock systems aren't always accurate so if the supplier goes to pick the product and find they haven't got any left they obviously can't supply it so would breach contract if that was the case - they cover themselves to avoid this.
In the US you can only take payment from the customer on dispatch of the goods which avoids this confusion somewhat.
Law overules T&C's everytime, you just need to ascertain whether what they have done is legal or not.

[FnG]magnolia;15136940 said:Speak to the CAB or a solicitor. You know, someone who acutally knows the answer. All of the above is just opinion and therefore next to useless.
There must be a couple of lawyers on here, though they might choose not to offer advice for free

I'm here to talk to people that want to help/advise, not people that wanna troll and argue for the hell of it.