DICE Takes The Cake

Goldfingers said:
You are extremely deluded if you think bad company is like battlefield 2. It's not, it's completely different. It scored 82 on metacritic http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/battlefieldbadcompany

Good, but nothing special. Now what makes it really uninteresting is it's a console game. It's effectively battlefield 2 for consoles. More arcadey, less people, smaller maps, less depth.

I find it quite depressing people are getting excited about a massively average release, with average features. Simply because it has dedicated servers. It is certainly no consolation (excuse the pun) for the murdering of the cod franchise for the PC.
Click to expand...

Bad company wasn't the best title they have ever released, they admitted that, quote, "We wouldn't advice building a complete to gfx engine while trying to design a game, that wont happen again thankfully and we can concentrate on what needs to be in a game"

Its not just about the dedicated servers, its about true battlefield experience without having to wait hours for a kill like opf2. I laugh when people say "bf is nothing like COD series".... Wrong COD4 is one track minded... yes you have game play mode etc... but you dont have anywhere near the content and rank system Battlefield have.

COD4 imo has got its come upance, it was a good game for a short time, then got old and boring extreamly quick. The BF series now has a variety of game modes not to mention up to 80 players online at once all with hardware.... Wave good bye to COD and make way for the true FPS game... 2010... year of BATTLEFIELD
 
Battlefield 1942 was amazing when I first played it, I had been playing things like HL and CS with small maps and no vehicles or planes. I was in awe qhwn I spawned on that aircraft carrier and looked at the map, got in a plane, flew round for a bit, crashed, respawned, shot someone then got in a tank. woo.

So If I could do that with 64 players 5 or so years ago WTF are we doing with 16 players in 2010.

What kind of WAR takes place 8v8.
 
starfighter said:
Battlefield 1942 was amazing when I first played it, I had been playing things like HL and CS with small maps and no vehicles or planes. I was in awe qhwn I spawned on that aircraft carrier and looked at the map, got in a plane, flew round for a bit, crashed, respawned, shot someone then got in a tank. woo.

So If I could do that with 64 players 5 or so years ago WTF are we doing with 16 players in 2010.

What kind of WAR takes place 8v8.
Click to expand...

That is a spot on quote there mate..... battlefield was years ahead of any COD game. But hey all the COD community saw was pretty gfx and team death match!

Grr really annoys me!!
 
Thegoon84 said:
That is a spot on quote there mate..... battlefield was years ahead of any COD game. But hey all the COD community saw was pretty gfx and team death match!

Grr really annoys me!!
Click to expand...
Please tell me you're not being serious? :/ So the 14million people that bought Call of Duty 4 bought it for the 'pretty gfx and team death match!'? :confused: Give me a break. The Call of Duty games were all exceptional, just because you preferred Battlefield, don't insult the intelligence of the millions of people that enjoyed/enjoy the Call of Duty games. :o
 
I thought the first Bad Company was a bit crap really, like the humour and general storytelling but it fell down in a lot of other areas. Hopefully this will be a big improvement though :)
 
naffa said:
Please tell me you're not being serious? :/ So the 14million people that bought Call of Duty 4 bought it for the 'pretty gfx and team death match!'? :confused: Give me a break. The Call of Duty games were all exceptional, just because you preferred Battlefield, don't insult the intelligence of the millions of people that enjoyed/enjoy the Call of Duty games. :o
Click to expand...

I see games for what they are..... COD4 one track infantry only game.... boring same old same old..... few perks.... any noob can get to top rank, its a noob game i'm sorry, all my mates who played it have K/d's of like 4.00..... that is shocking, not challenging and very very repetitive with no team play (GO ON TELL ME I'M WRONG).... the 14million people who bought it were mostly console heads..... the rest of the PC community who played it were prob bored of BF2 or simply never played it... what do you expect when every1 starts playing one game.... every1 follows.... so it doesn't really matter how many people play it still doesn't make it any better.
 
Last edited:
Shamikebab said:
I thought the first Bad Company was a bit crap really, like the humour and general storytelling but it fell down in a lot of other areas. Hopefully this will be a big improvement though :)
Click to expand...

Yes it did big time, was gutted with it tbh. However from my personal view they've sorted all those problems out.... for 9.99 1943 is un-believably amazing, i literally cant stop playing the bloody game... so much fun and it only has 4 maps!! If future games of BF are half as good as 1943 then they will jump over other FPS's head!

~>Dg<~ said:
cake, lol that made me pre order :D

hope its not just another bag of tripe like heroes
Click to expand...

This game was a free 3rd person shooter that was made for any day game play, it was garbage but had some good points in it. It was never going to be a top sell, DICE imo are testing the market to see how best to release BF3!
 
Thegoon84 said:
I see games for what they are..... COD4 one track infantry only game.... boring same old same old..... few perks.... any noob can get to top rank, its a noob game i'm sorry, all my mates who played it have K/d's of like 4.00..... that is shocking, not challenging and very very repetitive with no team play (GO ON TELL ME I'M WRONG).... the 14million people who bought it were mostly console heads..... the rest of the PC community who played it were prob bored of BF2 or simply never played it... what do you expect when every1 starts playing one game.... every1 follows.... so it doesn't really matter how many people play it still doesn't make it any better.
Click to expand...
Right, well you sure showed me. :rolleyes: I don't even think I can reply to that. :p
 
naffa said:
Right, well you sure showed me. :rolleyes: I don't even think I can reply to that. :p
Click to expand...

Lol. Sorry didn't mean to tell you not to reply.

Am i wrong tho in what i say? what is so great about COD4? i personally cant understand?

Skyfall said:
I'd give them cake if they made BF 2142 in frostbite.
Click to expand...

I;d be shocked if they didn't bring that out... prob have like a 2143 version of that for £9.99 around next xmas you watch haha.... not a lover of future FPS's personally but hey each to their own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom