Associate
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 718
I'm still trying to figure out why an UMP45 does more damage at range than an M4. It feels so wrong using an SMG for such long distances!
*** Official Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Thread ***
- Thread starter Kreeeee
- Start date
Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
Rate of fire.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2009
- Posts
- 718
It has higher bullet damage at range. Compare the two on Hardcore and you'll see what I mean.
It makes no sense!
Extra magazines, grenades, claymores etc - It's a lovely perk
Think thats my new perk 1 then!
2 claymores would be ace on S+D
Associate
- Joined
- 20 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 295
- Location
- Preston
Do many of you play it on the xbox?
You pick up claymores ?
(obviously from dead people and not ones that have been laid)Awesome
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 3,076
- Location
- a galaxy far far away
everyones going on about killstreaks but im lucky to get anything 5+ i must suck bad at this game!
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 7,906
- Location
- North West
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 71
Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
After playing for some time now i have to say im a bit disappointed about how shots and kills are handled, it's definitely a bit different from cod4 where i would do much better on average ratio wise, so i have to accept a poor ratio as standard here for anything other than pure camping, of course you can end up getting less points overall that way unless you have some good kill streaks setup but im talking about shots and kill physics i suppose you'd call it.
Quite a few things bug me but they've been talked about, namely lag, host advantage, huge hit boxes and other differences over cod4, one thing though that could make up for this somewhat would be if it was actually possible for players who did similarly well shooting each other to both be killed simultaneously, this seems to be impossible with bullets, it can happen with nades vs bullets of course but i wish this were the case with just bullets because at least then it could equalise and make things feel a bit more fair, instead it seems to be more like random chance who gets the kill most of the time and im often the unlucky one!
Quite a few things bug me but they've been talked about, namely lag, host advantage, huge hit boxes and other differences over cod4, one thing though that could make up for this somewhat would be if it was actually possible for players who did similarly well shooting each other to both be killed simultaneously, this seems to be impossible with bullets, it can happen with nades vs bullets of course but i wish this were the case with just bullets because at least then it could equalise and make things feel a bit more fair, instead it seems to be more like random chance who gets the kill most of the time and im often the unlucky one!
You pick up claymores ?
Awesome
Yeah it's great! With scavenger pro on it replenishes all equipment that you've used so as long as there are enough dead bodies you can just lay trails of claymores or fire endless grenades
Yeah it's great! With scavenger pro on it replenishes all equipment that you've used so as long as there are enough dead bodies you can just lay trails of claymores or fire endless grenades
Its a max of 2 claymores...when you lay the 3rd the 1st explodes.
Lordy that chopper is silly!
The other team must have been raging with all the spawn kills. Does seem a little OP though.
I still can't get my head around the very top of the leaderboard. I mean, one guy on there who's third, has over 35,000 kills to only 519 deaths, with a killstreak of 730! Yes, I know some people are awesome at the game, but that awesome?
Just checked again, the same guy has racked up an extra 15,000 kills since I posted. There's just no way that's possible.
Just checked again, the same guy has racked up an extra 15,000 kills since I posted. There's just no way that's possible.
Probably in a game with his friends just standing there and racking up kills.