LOL at all the 13 year old girls banding together on that forum. Awesome.![]()
They’re all holding hands and waiting for 18:50. Will they start crying if they don't make number one.

LOL at all the 13 year old girls banding together on that forum. Awesome.![]()
This manipulation thing is rubbish anyway, it's not an issue and I don't see why it's been so heavily debated on here for the last three pages (or however many it's been). It's just fallover from the Joe forums.
Where do I get this thing called a radio?
Is there a live stream?
They’re all holding hands and waiting for 18:50. Will they start crying if they don't make number one.![]()
Where do I get this thing called a radio?
Is there a live stream?
They’re all holding hands and waiting for 18:50. Will they start crying if they don't make number one.![]()
If it weren't 10 vs 1 it would be too easyIt's PMKeates. He's always on the other side of the argument for kicks.![]()
If they had bought they song because they like it, fine. However, the group was set up, designed and run to maximise RATM's position in the chart, and for no other purpose.So getting a great song to #1 is distorting the charts. People buying a song they like isn't allowed.![]()
I wonder if the Beeb have called St John's ambulance and the Samaritans in yet...
The UK could possibly lose an entire generation of girls tonight![]()
I think its more of a childline issue, they have been abused by awful music![]()
I wonder if the Beeb have called St John's ambulance and the Samaritans in yet...
That's a good point. All any of us have done is line the pockets of Sony.Joe would normally have been #1; if he's #2 the record company will have still made the same profit.
There's a huge irony that RATM's revolutionary politics have just been spun in their face.