They're not moonbats! They're furless moonsquirrels!
I stand corrected.

They're not moonbats! They're furless moonsquirrels!
Because they were statements you made and then said I'd made.
I have refused to defend your statements. Why on earth should I? They're your statements, not mine. You defend them. And yes, I have insulted you and continued to do so every time you made a statement, claimed I had made it and insulted me.
Where?
I don't think being unsure is reason to apologise.
By saying that I think you're not a trustworthy source? Yes, I did that. Why on earth would I regard you as a trustworthy source after all this?
Or maybe it's because I'm not making things up and attributing them to you, so I don't have any reason to do the same as you have done.
dont bother answering this because it will just be more waffle and hubris. leave it as it is.
The procession in Wootton Basset is therefore an attempt to engage the British publics minds on the real reasons why their soldiers are returning home in body bags and the real cost of the war. The conflict in Afghanistan is not an ‘honourable' defence of British values and a cause for the British to remain secure, rather the presence of the US and UK forces in Afghanistan is the cause of instability in the region and a cause of insecurity for the British people back home. The parades, the speeches about soldiers doing their duty and the feeling of patriotism has obfuscated the reality of the conflict and the murderous crimes being committed by the occupiers and their agents. The British public is blissfully unaware of what is being done in their name by the Blair/Brown regimes and were the truth known no doubt the pressure to withdraw all troops immediately would be much greater.
the sooner the world awakes to this very obvious fact then the better it will be.
Do you disagree with that?
--Regardless of what they stand for--
The following is part of their letter to the families of British soldiers who have died in the Afghan/Iraq wars:
Do you disagree with that? It seems to me that their protest is to highlight that British soldiers are sent there causing instability and all sorts of problems, ending in body bags from both sides for the profits of some politicians and their friends. It has nothing to do with freedom or whatever else, it's just about money and power. What's wrong with believing and protesting about that?
Why has this thread generated into posting quotes from ancient Christian mythology ? Talk about Muslims living in the dark ages![]()
The existence of God is a myth along with Goblins & fairies, & the Loch Ness monster & the sooner the world awakes to this very obvious fact then the better it will be.
--Regardless of what they stand for--
The following is part of their letter to the families of British soldiers who have died in the Afghan/Iraq wars:
Do you disagree with that? It seems to me that their protest is to highlight that British soldiers are sent there causing instability and all sorts of problems, ending in body bags from both sides for the profits of some politicians and their friends. It has nothing to do with freedom or whatever else, it's just about money and power. What's wrong with believing and protesting about that?
Why has this thread generated into posting quotes from ancient Christian mythology ? Talk about Muslims living in the dark ages![]()
The existence of God is a myth along with Goblins & fairies, & the Loch Ness monster & the sooner the world awakes to this very obvious fact then the better it will be.
No, what profit? what murderous crimes are soldiers committing? It's a bunch of lies.
Causing instability? You have to be joking with out the ISF the country would be torn apart and in a massive civil war.
Thats disgusting. Do you have the link for this?
Profit: The Iraqi oil contracts which are being given to British firms, with BP first in line and British Gas bidding for a second well at the moment. Check it up, it's not fantasy. Iraq has 115 billion barrels at the moment in reserves. The oil firms stand to make 2$ per barrel which is over 10% operating profit per barrel.
International oil companies were put off by the Iraqi oil ministry's demands that they cut the fee they collect on every barrel extracted over 20-year contracts
The BP-Chinese National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) deal was only secured when the consortium agreed to cut its fee per barrel from £3.99 to $2.
This is not Iraq this is about afghanistan. Anyway provide a link as far as I know we have no oil contracts. even if we did there is no profit, the war has cost us many times the oil.Profit: The Iraqi oil contracts which are being given to British firms, with BP first in line and British Gas bidding for a second well at the moment. Check it up, it's not fantasy. Iraq has 115 billion barrels at the moment in reserves. The oil firms stand to make 2$ per barrel which is over 10% operating profit per barrel.
Instability: Do you really think that Iraq and Afghanistan are more stable now politically and internally than what they were before the war? I am not talking whether they are more 'free', but how stable they are. They are in total chaos as far as I can see.
Evidence, That this is being done routinely and with knowledge. That letter is a disgrace, opinionated and a lie. It can not be compared to Vietnam war or world wars, those had large relatively light trained army.Crimes: Perhaps it has not occured to you but any civilian casualty in a war is not necessarily justified. The truth of the matter is that during wars atrocities do take place.
The BP Chinese group got it because they offered the best deal by far
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...701252/BP-wins-biggest-Iraq-oil-contract.html
So what you're saying is in a live televised auction between any oil company that wanted a shot at it, Britain somehow "forced" the Iraqis to chose the best deal?
Also where are all the contracts going to the Americans then?
He says that the constitution is clear that international accords and treaties signed by Iraq and any foreign country must go through parliament for approval, but that commercial agreements don't need to be legally approved by parliament, according to the Iraqi constitution, no matter how large the contract, or how long the duration.
http://www1.voanews.com/english/news/middle-east/12dec09-iraq-oil-79122227.html
I have cited sources for the oil deals, a simple google search will unearth them. They took place around 12-13 December 09.This is not Iraq this is about afghanistan. Anyway provide a link as far as I know we have no oil contracts. even if we did there is no profit, the war has cost us many times the oil.
Again this is about Afghanistan and continuing forces there. The country without help would be in turmoil. The war has happened you can not go back. therefore to withdraw is totally unacceptable.
Evidence, That this is being done routinely and with knowledge. That letter is a disgrace, opinionated and a lie. It can not be compared to Vietnam war or world wars, those had large relatively light trained army.
why are they ignoring all the other countries in Afghanistan. it is not just UK and America the ISF is sanctioned by the UN and includes many countries.