I've only just realised that you cannot choose where steam installs its games to and unfortunately I have quite a few steam games.
My plan was that I would use my x-25 ssd as the os drive for more regularly played games and my 1Tb F1 for everything else i.e. media and rarely played games.
Since I realised you can't split the instalations I could move all my steam games to the F1 but that kind of defeats the purpose I bought the ssd for.
So should I buy 2 500Gb F3 and raid 0 them for all steam games and media etc, using the F1 as a backup drive/spare and x-25 as OS and office programs and non steam games.
Or
Save up some more and get the cheapest 60-80Gb ssd and use x-25 as os/office, new ssd for steam games and F1 as media.
Or
Save up even more and raid 0 2 x-25 to give 160Gb for OS, Office and steam games and F1 for media.
Sorry It's a long post, basically I want to know which would be best performance / cost (i.e. bang for buck)
My plan was that I would use my x-25 ssd as the os drive for more regularly played games and my 1Tb F1 for everything else i.e. media and rarely played games.
Since I realised you can't split the instalations I could move all my steam games to the F1 but that kind of defeats the purpose I bought the ssd for.
So should I buy 2 500Gb F3 and raid 0 them for all steam games and media etc, using the F1 as a backup drive/spare and x-25 as OS and office programs and non steam games.
Or
Save up some more and get the cheapest 60-80Gb ssd and use x-25 as os/office, new ssd for steam games and F1 as media.
Or
Save up even more and raid 0 2 x-25 to give 160Gb for OS, Office and steam games and F1 for media.
Sorry It's a long post, basically I want to know which would be best performance / cost (i.e. bang for buck)
) and it seems so cheap for those drives. Or I'll hold on till a 2nd ssd becomes more affordable.