Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 5,488
I'm laughing at his numbers because which actors have a quote of $30m these days? Perhaps if you're talking about Tom Cruise or Will Smith, but those two are exceptions rather than the rule.
But let's say you stick in Will Smith and you have some other reasonably well know actors playing other parts - you're still struggling to get anywhere near the standard for a summer blockbuster budget these days which is $150m+.
Whichever way you look at it, producing District 9 was a fantastic achievement for $30m all in.![]()
He has got a point in terms of crew costs and the like.
You know Hero cost $30 million...the most expensive Asian film ever if I recall correctly. The Hollywood equivalent would be much more expensive mainly because hiring thousands of extras would cost a lot more and that $30m figure for District 9 could be sexed up for marketing.
Also, didn't Peter Jackson fund this film and didn't it use WETA (that he owns) for its CGI? So maybe there was some cost-cutting going on there...
You do realise camera crews and unit directors and cinematographers can cost millions also? Not just actors. Its true for stuff like Avatar and Watchmen the actors probably didn't cost a lot but that's not always what the money gets spend on. District 9 may have required people to take paycuts or something aswell. Could be some profit sharing going on also.
Basically, its not as simple as it 'just' costing $30m.