Doctors urge ban on smoking in cars

What's your point in reiterating what I said?

I think his point is, the people who cant handle minor distractions, that he doesnt care about them (and rightly so) and they shouldnt be driving

And because they shouldnt be driving there is no need to take them in account..

So saying some people cant do it is not a good enough reason to ban everyone, because they shouldnt be driving in the first place
 

Please elaborate....

Smoking can, like anything else be a distraction, but the law doesn't require you to be the best driver ever all the time, just a minimum standard e.g. 6mm of tread on good tyres is desirable, but legally 1.6mm on dithcfinders will do.

When i am hooning round country lanes i don't smoke, for the fact i am trying to conventrate, on a motorway at 70mph i require much less attention to avoid crashing.

Smoking around small children <5 years with the windows closed is one thing, but 10+ years with the windows open on an irregular basis is almost an irrelevancy (medially, unless they have medical issues etc).

We have laws in place to combat bad driving, why do we need another law, careless/dangerous driving is well established and if someone crashes because they were smoking, eating, drinking or just a crap driver they can be prosecuted.

I would also be interested to see the raw data used to come up with this study as any data can be manipulated to saw whatever you want in most cases.

People need to calm down, if you don't want people smoking in your car that's ok, but imagine someone saying you cannot watch violent films or listen to music with swearing in your house because it may harm your children.

And then imagine i am saying i agree with it and you are scum.
 
Please elaborate....

Smoking can, like anything else be a distraction, but the law doesn't require you to be the best driver ever all the time, just a minimum standard e.g. 6mm of tread on good tyres is desirable, but legally 1.6mm on dithcfinders will do.

When i am hooning round country lanes i don't smoke, for the fact i am trying to conventrate, on a motorway at 70mph i require much less attention to avoid crashing.

Smoking around small children <5 years with the windows closed is one thing, but 10+ years with the windows open on an irregular basis is almost an irrelevancy (medially, unless they have medical issues etc).

We have laws in place to combat bad driving, why do we need another law, careless/dangerous driving is well established and if someone crashes because they were smoking, eating, drinking or just a crap driver they can be prosecuted.

I would also be interested to see the raw data used to come up with this study as any data can be manipulated to saw whatever you want in most cases.

People need to calm down, if you don't want people smoking in your car that's ok, but imagine someone saying you cannot watch violent films or listen to music with swearing in your house because it may harm your children.

And then imagine i am saying i agree with it and you are scum.

We can get fined for drinking, eating etc, smoking is no different.

I used to smoke, and the best cigs I had were when driving. If I still smoked I'd have the same opinion as yourself, because it was something I throughly enjoyed. Since giving up, I can see that it is just another distraction whilst driving. The cig could drop on the carpet, prompting the driver to pick it up to stop the floor burning, ash can come off cig and into your eye when you're flicking it out of the window, you can be distracted while lighting the cig whilst driving, we try to do it before we set off, but I don't think that's always the case, and then there is the attention it takes to put it out afterwards, not the easiest thing to do if you don't throw it out the window like most people.

The best thing I did was quit. As someone with not a lot of disposable income, it saved me a fortune, and I don't feel the need to smoke anymore, I don't get stressed every few hours to then be de-stressed by a smoking
 
We can get fined for drinking, eating etc, smoking is no different. They are not trying to ban eating in cars

Since giving up, I can see that it is just another distraction whilst driving.
It is obvious it can be a distraction, like anything you have the weigh up the consequences and the situation, as i mentioned previously

The cig could drop on the carpet, prompting the driver to pick it up to stop the floor burning,
Unless you have petrol on your floor, most people would pull over asap, not take their eyes off the road. I know this as there are not 100 crashes on my way to work

ash can come off cig and into your eye when you're flicking it out of the window,
I use the ashtray, but on the occasion i flick it out the window i have never had it in my eye.

you can be distracted while lighting the cig whilst driving,
fair point, you have to be a bit of a novice to have to look at the fag while lighting it

and then there is the attention it takes to put it out afterwards.

I have to disagree, stubbing out a fag is one of the most basic tasks in life and requires less concentration than changing gear.

The best thing I did was quit.
good, i'm very happy for you.

As someone with not a lot of disposable income, it saved me a fortune
it is expensive, but i am lucky enough to be in a position where it is not a financial strain in any way
 
You know you just repeated what I said and also showing that you didn't read everything I wrote? I said I knew that and some of us can deal with minor distractions but other people can't.

Just because you can, should the road be full of the morons who can't?

Your question was "Just because you can, should the road be full of the morons who can't?"

I know that is a question because it has a ? at the end.

I tell you what, I will say it again with one extra word, try reading the whole thing and formulating a proper response.

NO! if you cant deal with minor distractions whilst driving in a safe way then you should not be allowed to drive.

Is that any better?
 
I see your point's, what I was trying to say is that if drinking and eating isn't legal, then smoking shouldn't be either, as it's no different.

The fact the people want to outlaw it on health grounds is just pathetic, it doesn't matter where people smoke, if they are a smoker, they will smoke regardless, so if it is banned, it should be on the grounds that it is (slightly) dangerous as is eating / drinking
 
I see your point's, what I was trying to say is that if drinking and eating isn't legal, then smoking shouldn't be either, as it's no different.

Eating and drinking are not illegal to do behind the wheel.

The highway code lists them as distractions and added smoking a few years ago.
 
I wish people would get over the health arguments against smoking. I'm pretty sure being sat in-front of a computer all day is unhealthy but I don't see that being banned. In fact nothing I do is healthy and then you have people who binge eat on McDonald's all day which is far worse.
 
I wish people would get over the health arguments against smoking. I'm pretty sure being sat in-front of a computer all day is unhealthy but I don't see that being banned. In fact nothing I do is healthy and then you have people who binge eat on McDonald's all day which is far worse.

Wow. :eek: I don't know if you're joking or not.
 
Obesity burdens the NHS so yes it does affect other people. You have to pay for it. At least smokers cover themselves in the amount of taxes they pay.

Fat people don't wave their fat around in my face at bus stops. Diffusion, on the other hand, has no such sense of dignity.
 
Your question was "Just because you can, should the road be full of the morons who can't?"

I know that is a question because it has a ? at the end.

I tell you what, I will say it again with one extra word, try reading the whole thing and formulating a proper response.

NO! if you cant deal with minor distractions whilst driving in a safe way then you should not be allowed to drive.

Is that any better?

I'm really not sure you understand what I am trying to say.
You keep repeating what I am saying, I agree with you but you seem to be taking it as if I'm arguing against you, I am not! :)

You also seem to think that people you mention actually stop themselves driving. This does not happen, people are idiots and do all sorts of things whilst driving, some just simply drive. Badly. Then accidents happens.

Now because of these people the rest of us have to suffer, with things like increased insurance costs and new laws. Laws like not using a mobile phone whilst driving make sense to me.
But the fact that people do have problems not getting distracted and continue to drive is enough reason to make those who do it punishable.
Simply saying "if you cant deal with minor distractions whilst driving in a safe way then you should not be allowed to drive." does not help anything, people will keep driving....


...and being morons.

Edit:

But it's silly, they'd have to ban drinking too (not alcohol, the act of drinking anything) or doing anything other than driving, there's far they can go...so I don't see this working.
 
Last edited:
I occasionally smoke in the car, but I never smoke whilst driving anymore, because I once had an incident where i flicked a fag-end out of the window, only for it to come straight back in and land on the back seat. :p Never again.
 
Back
Top Bottom