Permabanned
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2008
- Posts
- 4,080
- Location
- London
Bluerays are cool and have the capability of holding all the lord of the rings Jackson films on one disc.
Doing this they could offer cool features like 'watch the whole lot (9 hours odd) without credits in between them'. If you are so inclined. Or more reasonably 'only look after one disk, and don't change the disc when you're changing films it's all in one place mate' and 'don't clog up your limited shelf space with a massive box' feature! Hoorah.
However the marketing men say that people simply wouldn't pay as much for 1 disk as they don't feel they are getting as much, it's a psychological thing. So for NO FUNCTIONALITY REASON AT ALL, NO EXTRA CONTENT AT ALL they're splitting it over 5 disks.
A bigger box, a bigger 'shelf-presence', and in theory the customers (you and me) think 'wow look at the number of blu-ray disks you get, that's gotta worth £50 ain't it, boy you get a lot of disks it's the - I dunno - 'ULTIMATE BOX SET AWESOMENESS''??
So just a quick question. You lot are more technically savvy than the average plums. Would you either
1) Spend £50 and get 1 disk, 1 normal size box, easy mcsqueezy
or
2) Spend £50 and get 5 disks, including a seperate disk for .. I dunno .. the 'see how they did golums makeup' special feature film (20 minutes long, about 0.1% of disc space used). It comes in a blimin' huge 4 inch wide box wow how awesome and has a big picture of a Nazgul on the front wow wow wow?
I'd definately go for the one disk small box. But I showed my mate mock-ups of both boxes and he says 'NO WAY he'd pay £50 for the 1-disc version as it looks like a rip-off'
!!!!!
So - over to you - same price, same content - would you buy big fancy pants lots-o-discs version, or 1 disc jobs'a'good'un version? Both £50?
EDIT_ THIS IS A THEORETICAL QUESTION for if they COULD fit the films on to one disk without losing any content or quality.
Doing this they could offer cool features like 'watch the whole lot (9 hours odd) without credits in between them'. If you are so inclined. Or more reasonably 'only look after one disk, and don't change the disc when you're changing films it's all in one place mate' and 'don't clog up your limited shelf space with a massive box' feature! Hoorah.
However the marketing men say that people simply wouldn't pay as much for 1 disk as they don't feel they are getting as much, it's a psychological thing. So for NO FUNCTIONALITY REASON AT ALL, NO EXTRA CONTENT AT ALL they're splitting it over 5 disks.

So just a quick question. You lot are more technically savvy than the average plums. Would you either
1) Spend £50 and get 1 disk, 1 normal size box, easy mcsqueezy
or
2) Spend £50 and get 5 disks, including a seperate disk for .. I dunno .. the 'see how they did golums makeup' special feature film (20 minutes long, about 0.1% of disc space used). It comes in a blimin' huge 4 inch wide box wow how awesome and has a big picture of a Nazgul on the front wow wow wow?
I'd definately go for the one disk small box. But I showed my mate mock-ups of both boxes and he says 'NO WAY he'd pay £50 for the 1-disc version as it looks like a rip-off'
!!!!!
So - over to you - same price, same content - would you buy big fancy pants lots-o-discs version, or 1 disc jobs'a'good'un version? Both £50?
EDIT_ THIS IS A THEORETICAL QUESTION for if they COULD fit the films on to one disk without losing any content or quality.
Last edited: