Not even for watching videos on the web?
Well I use iPlayer and Youtube. What else you refering to skip?
Not even for watching videos on the web?
Well I use iPlayer and Youtube. What else you refering to skip?
The other sites where you can watch TV shows for free.![]()
What happens if you install OS4 and your not a dev?
I was replying to the guy that pre-supposed that I wanted "proper multitasking". I don't, I've never said I wanted that, it's a misrepresentation of my position with an attack on it based on speculation (battery life, performance, etc). Like I said, a straw man.
Again for the cheap seats - pausing an application in the background and/or allowing privileged applications (GPS, etc) to do minor things is a good idea, but withholding "task pausing" from 2G/3G simply because Apple want to force those users to upgrade, not for any technological constraint (ala MMS), leaves a bitter taste in the mouth. Non-iPhones manage proper multitasking with less RAM and less processing power, but apparently iPhone 3Gs are ZX Spectrums now.
I'm somewhat unaffected by this turn of events because I was intending to get the next gen iPhone anyway, but this is yet another reminder that Apple persue a modus operandi of forced obsolescence, and whatever new iPhone they release this year probably "won't support" whichever new features Apple come up with in iPhone 5.0 or whatever, simply because Apple decide it won't.
I've got a 2G. The reason I haven't got a 3G/3GS is not due to cost, it's purely because I've had no need to upgrade - I don't have a decent 3G signal around where I live and all I typically ever use is WiFi either at work, at home or via O2 Cloud.So you own an iPhone 3G? Mine was a laggy POS on iPhone 3.x. It's certainly no worse or better on 4.0. I can't imagine what it would be like with multitasking though. No doubt it would be a lot worse. I'm glad its not there.*
*I will be getting the next iPhone, however.
That's business, and to a lesser degree, life. Apple, of course, would never be so evil.... wait.My gripe really is about features being withheld purely for business case reasons. I firmly believe there is no technical reason why 2Gs can't do MMS. They have a camera, they support GPRS - that really is all that's needed, and it's been a feature in older phones with slower hardware since time immemorial. Yet, despite the iPhone being a revolutionary phone I still have to pick up MMS by going to a website, simply because Apple thinks I'm a lower-class citizen.
I'll likely be buying the next iPhone "just cos" but it's a sobering reminder than come next year whichever one is released this year will probably be excluded in some fashion for nebulous "technical reasons" that don't stand up to scrutiny.
Anyone want to start guessing now as to what "revolutionary" feature will be added to OS 5 next year but won't be available to 3GS phones due to "technical limitations"?
Just look at what new fetures come out on phones comming out between now and then, and thats what apple will probably add![]()
It's not usually so obvious though.That's business, and to a lesser degree, life. Apple, of course, would never be so evil.... wait.![]()
Just watched the iPhone OS4 presentation... looks interesting. Have Apple well and truely 'nailed it' now?