Poll: The Last Leaders Debate – Live tonight at 2030 BST on BBC One

Who will you vote for?

  • Labour

    Votes: 67 11.8%
  • Conservatives

    Votes: 231 40.7%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 227 40.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 42 7.4%

  • Total voters
    567
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nice post Hatter, I've got to stop believing everything politicians say. I was thinking whilst I was watching the debate and the question on 80% migrants from EU - "Why is Cameron avoiding that question?" Turns out the statement isn't even correct.

/facepalm
 
Wow, clegg really is a two faced lieing ****

Can we please put these party leaders infront of a real interview that will actually force them to answer the questions. Instead of the constant rubbish their saying.

also, the number of students that seem to think libdems are going to legalise cannabis is worrying
 
It'll be interesting to see the ramifications if the Tories don't win an outright majority, whilst for Labour I think them losing a overall majority has been a foregone conclusion for quite some time and with that I suspect Brown will step down, a lot of the senior backbench Tories have kept quiet and 'on-message' about Cameron & Osbourne's 'NuTory' tactics, in the main I'm sure because the polls have been consistently favourable to a Tory win - if they fail to win an overall majority after all that anticipation will we see the old divides and squabbling start again, or will Cameron have to sacrifice his buddy to keep the party intact?
 
I disagree, The LibDems are advocating some pretty 'out there' policies, Road charging, immigration amnesties, local income tax, VAT on new build houses including low income housing and so on. He actually wants to tax the poorer sections of society more, not less.

He wants to cut working tax credit and child tax credit far more than the Conservatives, who just say people earning more than £50k do not need child tax credit. The policies do not advocate a fairer society, regardless of what Cleggs soundbites may say.

Economies rely on private businesses, not Governments. To support business is not a bad thing or an indication of stupidity as you claim.

To be honest you've misrepresent my position (and theirs come to think of it sufficiently that I just can't be bothered to correct you in detail before going to bed, though I'm interested in the idea that imposing VAT on new build is 'out there' as it's actually a fairly logical move to bring it in line with other work (renovations and such) and it's an odd carryover that it isn't currently charged.

And I never implied supporting business was stupid, find me anywhere I did. I suggested that coming from a background of business and then embracing policies uncritically supportive of business isn't terribly ingenious or intellectually challenging. I've more respect for somebody who comes from that background and stops to question whether that unquestioning support is actually the right thing to do, whether they're right or not they certainly gain some credibility for their thought processes.
 
David Cameron: "Once again, the Prime Minister is confusing the Government with the economy. I plan to rescue the economy by making your politics better value for money."

Right. Not to mention all of the other contradictions surrounding him, based on tonight alone.
 
I wish people who don't know about politics would take one of these '30 questions' things which tell you which party is most for you and simply vote for them rather than not voting or just voting with complete ignorance.
 
But then you're surrendering yourself to the falsehood that the party manifestos contain the policies that that party would enact, were they to make up the government.
 
But then you're surrendering yourself to the falsehood that the party manifestos contain the policies that that party would enact, were they to make up the government.

Well we've had 13 years where people vote for Labour's ideology and not what they actually get done.
 
I can vote for Labour knowing what to expect, I cannot with either the Conservatives or the Liberal Democrats. I don't base my vote on the manifesto commitments.
 
I can vote for Labour knowing what to expect, I cannot with either the Conservatives or the Liberal Democrats. I don't base my vote on the manifesto commitments.

Labour wont be able to continue as they are, they have to stop spending money.
 
cant believe people here like cameron

hes the most unlikeable person since that guy off grand designs who calls peoples houses crap behind their backs then goes upto them and tells them ''ohh i love that''

forum you disappoint
 
Last edited:
Labour wont be able to continue as they are, they have to stop spending money.
Sorry, I should probably clarify further.

You're absolutely correct, public spending is going to have to be cut, severely. What I meant is that I feel confident I knowing what I'd be voting for, should I vote Labour. Although one can make reasoned judgements regarding the other two major parties, I think one could have more confidence in knowing how a future Labour government would behave.
 
Haven't read the thread, but how anyone can vote for Cameron or Clegg is beyong me.

Cameron is so slimey its unbelievable, and Clegg just sounds like a kid who has no idea what he is going to do.

Brown, while he may have messed up in the past etc, at least has the right ideas on how to move forward :confused:
 
Agreed, I love Adam Bolton, Kay Burley and Jeff Randell. They make mince meat of the wishy washy, limp wristed BBC offerings.

Good debate, think people are getting tired of Clegg going on about "the same old party politics" YAWN!
Adam Bolton and Jeff Randall sure, but Kay Burley?! Are you kidding?! I know Sky News refer to Fox News in the US as their sister station but she's really on the wrong side of the pond. Most annoying, loud but vapid presenter they've ever had on.
 
Cameron - Teacher
Clegg - Preacher
Brown - Leecher

I honestly though that Clegg was going to say Amen after each of his sermons.
 
Adam Bolton and Jeff Randall sure, but Kay Burley?! Are you kidding?! I know Sky News refer to Fox News in the US as their sister station but she's really on the wrong side of the pond. Most annoying, loud but vapid presenter they've ever had on.

She just tells it how it is and doesn't take crap from politicians, I like her. Earlier when Sky were outside Birmingham Uni and as to be expected, vacuous students were being immature: she made some comment about the "silly children" - you just wouldn't get that sort of frankness on the politically correct bbc.

Also, Mark Kleinman is epic and Lucy Verasamy is fit - it's just so much better to watch than the bbc.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom