Not to the detriment of the wishes of the Public. Give us a referendum at the very least - let us decide.
I agree. It's well overdue.
Not to the detriment of the wishes of the Public. Give us a referendum at the very least - let us decide.
I think (and may be wrong)
Nick Clegg is saying 'The Tories sound best at the moment' to make his hand stronger when he speaks to Labour.
The final result will be a referendum on PR, and a LibLab coalition.
What is that?
What would that mean?
News saying there's a lot of pressure on Cameron from his own party now as they thought he should have cleared up and hasn't, and tbf to them they've got a point. Brown is so unlikeable even those who voted labour don't like him and want him gone, therefore the Cons really should have cleared up.
Also they must fear for the future, Brown is a dead man walking, replace him with a likeable frontman and Labour will win the next election, that's got to be their fear.
Not to the detriment of the wishes of the Public. Give us a referendum at the very least - let us decide.
This is true.
I was between lib-con for voting and settled with lib dems because I wanted to see major reforms happening. Of course, there were aspects I didn't fully agree with on the lib dems but for me personally they spoke for more of the things I was for.
It seems to me that the general consensus here on this forum is if you don't vote conservative you are dumb, ill-informed and a joke to the voting the system - because your view/vote is not in line with theirs. It's this pathetic snobbery and attitude of superiority over people's views is really obvious here by some posters dominating the threads and protected/backed-up by their bandwagon buddies.
I am sorry if this offends some of you but it is blatantly obvious in this forum discussion of the election more so than others I have visited. Not a very welcoming nature of discussion at all from what I have observed over the last few weeks right up to now.
It's how they decide the US Presidential Candidates. The one with the lowest votes drops off and then they have another vote with the ones remaining. Winner takes all![]()
Secondly the cons arguing that a lab/lib coalition would be "morally wrong".. might want to consider that it would be 52/3% ish of the popular vote compared to their 36%
Anyone just seen that Labour numpty politician on the beeb just now? He said the result has shown the Country has decided Brown is the best PM and the Tories have made a horrendous lose last night.
Was he watching the same election as me?
Anyone just seen that Labour numpty politician on the beeb just now? He said the result has shown the Country has decided Brown is the best PM and the Tories have made a horrendous lose last night.
Was he watching the same election as me?
Watching the guy on BBC1 now claiming that the Conservatives have lost and seeing Paxman's incredulous face is hilarious.![]()
You mean the same Brown and team that have mis-managed our economy the last 13 years? The fact that you're a die hard Labourite shows how little you know. Get your head out of your backside and take a look at just how good a manager of our finances Brown has actually been.Best of a bad bunch. I believe Brown and team will do a better job at taking us out of this global recession than Cameron's 'take the money out of the economy' system would.
No, that's just your ignorance showing through.
Australia has enjoyed PR for almost 100 years and we're doing fine. Hung parliaments are rare, and strong governments are very common. You have no idea what you're talking about.
How is it anecdotal? It's evidence that PR can work. Whether you choose to look at that evidence or not is up to you, and evidence to everyone else just how little you actually know.Anecdotal.
How about two chambers? One similar to the MP system and another which has proportional representation?
If you compare the results with what was expected 2 months ago, Cameron has made a monumental bodge of it all ...
Best of a bad bunch. I believe Brown and team will do a better job at taking us out of this global recession than Cameron's 'take the money out of the economy' system would.