[TW]Fox;16683633 said:They are all different!!?

[TW]Fox;16683633 said:They are all different!!?
Have you suddenly come into money or something? Just seems odd that you've been running about in an Astra.
So what is important to you, prestige, performance, or both?
If all else fails just ask Spie would be my advice.
And since you flush with cash, do us a favour and buy Iand a car with your pocket change, you'd be doing everyone a favour![]()
![]()
[TW]Fox;16683633 said:They are all different!!?
I wouldn't of put the Cayman in the list personally besides for the fact it was mentioned a couple of times and I thought maybe i was missing a certain view point by not including it in the list.
I still like the look of it and it does tick a lot of boxes but just not as many as the cls or m3.
Cars are not investments (Except in some VERY rare cases), splashing out 50k is a bit frivolous is it not?
You can have a very nice car for 25k and under and it is quite apparent you have no real interest in cars for their driving offerings. You want a 10 plate on a BMW/Merc/Audi/Porsche etc for the "appeal"?
I am going to be totally blunt. This is a willy waving exercise, your criteria now is by playing Top Trumps between cars.
[TW]Fox;16683714 said:If you can't tell the difference between a 4 door luxury saloon and a 2 seater sports car donate your 50k to charity or something. It's wasted on a car.
Carvegio, problem is what do you mean by "performs better"
It's akin to asking who performs better...lead singer of Muse or Wayne Rooney? Both perform well but...