I'd have kicked Hitler in the goolies.
Don't you mean 'Goolie'?
I'd have kicked Hitler in the goolies.
did hitler not over rule his generals several times and mess things up for the german cause (without knowing it)? once the war was started I doubt killing hitler would have helped.. maybe even would have made the war drag on for longer with better decissions being made..
IF you said yes you would, but then in the year 2010 do nothing to help in africa, the sudan, or wherever, then you are but a dreamer - who talks a good game but ultimately delivers nothing.
That's roughly my thinking as well. However being Indian by genes (if that makes any sense), I'd possibly be one who'd seek a spare cupboard rather than being able to offer my own.
its true, i think the situation the OP is trying to ask, but in a ww2 frame of reference.
Would you help a minority inspite of grave personal danger/retribution?
IF you said yes you would, but then in the year 2010 do nothing to help in africa, the sudan, or wherever, then you are but a dreamer - who talks a good game but ultimately delivers nothing.
People react differently to something they see everyday right infront of them.
Only if you live in Africa or in a place where such ethnic violence is occuring. I have helped and continue to do so in Africa, would I do so if my Family was in danger if I continued, HELL NO.
see above, where you live makes no difference really. you either feel the compulsion to help other people in a dire situation, or you ignore the problem and hope it resolves itself.
so you have to have it stuck right under your nose to think it worthy of your intervention? with a load of SS officers running around i severly doubt it.
borders/the world is much smaller than it once was, you could get to africa for £500 if you really wanted. in ww2 times it was unlikely you'd ever really leave the country. unless you were in the army or super rich. this is no longer the case.
are you telling me that suffering =/ suffering simply because it is in a country other than your own?
see above, where you live makes no difference really. you either feel the compulsion to help other people in a dire situation, or you ignore the problem and hope it resolves itself.
Great summary
Goebbels had so much propaganda going on that people believed that Hitler was a superman and he was destined to lead Germany. they didn't hear about the bad things due to censorship, only Hitler's inspirational speeches
After all this, would you really go against the state? The propaganda means that you'd be brainwashed into believing that what Hitler was doing was all for the good of Germany.
That is almost making up an excuse for the populations 'ignorance' in my mind. For want of better words.
Many in Germany were correctly alarmed with the country running/leaning towards the far right in the road to war.
Not everyone was suckered in with 'inspirational' speeches. Moderate intellectuals anyway.
There were many Germans who didn't, civilians, students and the military.
However, the Nazis were able to deal with these people, as I've said. They used tactics such as the SS and Gestapo to keep people in fear and stop them from speaking out against the state
Interesting how you mention a Muslim attrocity in comparision, yet neglect to mention the Ethnic cleansing of the Bosniak Muslim population or the genocide of the Muslim population of Srebnenica which were the real representations of a modern holocaust.
Seems pretty disgusting to insinuate it was a Muslim led genocide.