Would you work in the nuclear energy industry and why?

Strongly pro nuclear and thus would be happy to work on it.

Anyone who cites Chenoybl obviously knows nothing about the incident; it was caused by an absolutely idiotic set of events that nobody with any sense would have allowed to happen.
 
Head-in-hands moment...
I would like reliable power, that's cheap, efficient and clean.

You focus too much on the construction costs, these costs will be recouped over time. They aren't flash-in-the pan short term earners...

It is slightly over done but I think they just wanted to show how much the soviets helped in reducing the consequences.

I know they're not but the cost to get fuel and reactors certainly isn't feasable in the UK not currently any way.

And how are those unclean, inefficient and expensive?
 
I think France produces 80% of it's energy from nuclear power and exports 1/5th of it to other EU states? Not bad considering it's not the biggest or most populated country in the EU. They've had very little incidents to my knowledge and it seems to be working well for them.
 
Anyone who cites Chenoybl obviously knows nothing about the incident; it was caused by an absolutely idiotic set of events that nobody with any sense would have allowed to happen.

exactly. the plant had allsorts of problems with it right from the start. basic safety functions missing. poor rod design. scientists who didnt listen to what they where told. it was just a total mess


it will never happen again.

theres around 450 in the world right now and no one has even came close to having problems

even countries who had banned them previously are now building. and id like to think those countries advisors have more knowledge than an internet docu that has some major facts wrong


I know they're not but the cost to get fuel and reactors certainly isn't feasable in the UK not currently any way.

And how are those unclean, inefficient and expensive?

it IS feasible. infact its a guaranteed money earner and economy booster which is something that we should be right behind.


solar panels use all sorts of horrible chemicals and in this country are inneficient. wind power is horribly inefficient and ruins ecosystems and landscapes. they are both expensive to put in place and while we still have oil/gas/nuclear it will take longer to make you money back than its even worth
 
Last edited:
Tidal, wind and solar aren't the greatest...

Although saying that, these are all improving technologies.
I'm not against the renewable technologies but renewables alone will not cut it.

Offshore windfarms are alright, hardly a solution for the country though, I hugely dislike windfarms on land.
Solar... Meh

One of the only problems with nuclear power was the waste, it sounds like this is nowhere near as big an issue now.

Tidal power...
How can this even be considered? I can't begin to imagine how it would work on a grand scale without damaging the coastline for wildlife.
 
Last edited:
One of the only problems with nuclear power was the waste, it sounds like this is nowhere near as big an issue now.

you just give it to the US who then make shells from it and bomb iraq with them. but thats a whole different topic ;):p


sending it into space has been talked about a lot
 
I have no issues working in the nuclear industry, whilst its not my main job (i'm in Oil & Gas) lots of my skills are directly transferable, i've just finished 3 months doing such work and whilst enjoyable i'm looking forward to getting back to Oil & Gas next week.
 
I think France produces 80% of it's energy from nuclear power and exports 1/5th of it to other EU states? Not bad considering it's not the biggest or most populated country in the EU. They've had very little incidents to my knowledge and it seems to be working well for them.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf40.html

Sounds about right Freefaller, earns them 3 Billion pa as they are the largest distributors so it says.

How would the UK earn money from Nuclear? Genuine ignorant question. :p

Just because we're on a lonely wee island. France is apart of the big Euro.
 
Would have no problems whatsoever, in fact it's a job I would love to be doing a few years down the line!

I've still yet to see once convincing argument against nuclear power; it seems the only people who strongly object it are those who know absolutely nothing about it, but somehow manage to convince a worryingly large amount of other people that they do.
 
i don't see a problem in working for it.. However i certainly would not cherish the responsibility of being a cheif engineer for any of the reactors....
 
So many conflicting reports on the interwebs but reading a lot of nuclear associations website has eliminated a lot of my fears...
 
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf40.html

Sounds about right Freefaller, earns them 3 Billion pa as they are the largest distributors so it says.

How would the UK earn money from Nuclear? Genuine ignorant question. :p

Just because we're on a lonely wee island. France is apart of the big Euro.

We're hooked up to the European Electricity Grid through France at the moment, but IIRC they're building another link to The Netherlands. We can sell to most of Europe just as they sell to us.
 
So many conflicting reports on the interwebs but reading a lot of nuclear associations website has eliminated a lot of my fears...

You really have nothing to "fear", the people who keep beating the same "its not safe" drum seem to think that our nuclear industry is run by a division of Mc Donalds.

Don't forget Nuclear Power plants aren't the only thing we have thats Nuclear in this country.
 
After watching too many Chernobyl documentaries I'm quite against it.

Plus it costs almost half a billion to make 1 station then there is maintenance costs, would it pay for its self over time? I doubt it.

From what I understand of Chernobyl basically it was the Soviets playing funny buggers and seeing what their systems could and could not do. BUt rather than dry test the system they tested it when it was live hence the meltdown. Ironically enough the accidnet happened whilst they were trying to test an emergency safety system.

Basically they were worried that in the case of a power failure in the normal energy grid, if during the same time Chernobyl was offline,then any Decay Heat could casue potential problems because the diesel back up generators at the power plant would not have time to kick in and keep the water coolant running to keep the core at the correct temperature. I think the window was only about a one minute window of error in which temperatures might get too high. They decided to test if the steam turbines in the plant would have enough power in them to keep the coolant system running ewaiting for the backup generators to kick in. Quite clearly they did not have enough power and the Soviets found this out the hard way. They had tested the system about 5 times over 3-4 years every time it had failed but they kept on trying it. Eventually it went completely bottoms up. Its quite political situation with a lot of people not telling others what was going on, such as the fact that from day one the reactor had been running without adequate safety systems but no one had stopped it being opened or operating.

I dont understand it all though, so please if someone knows a little more please correct me :)

Even better was the fact that the Soviets refused to admit that the accident was anything more than a fire at the plant. In their desire to cover up the incident they refused to even evacuate neighboring towns, Propyat (spl?) I think it was called, thus pretty much damning all the fire fighters, townspeople and others in the region for thier lies. I think they only admitted that there was a serious problem when a Swedish power station picked up the radiation readings.

Ultimately something like that would never happen unless it was a deliberate attempt to tamper with a reactor.
 
Upon reading on it just sounds like inexperienced personell messing with control rods, the power output went too high and heat output too and chemicals doing what they do best exploded. One guy put a control rod in too far and killed him and his partner instantly due to radiation poisoning.

They didn't tell anybody that it had happened because they hoped they could keep it hush hush... Then they evacuated pripyat after being told by sweden yeah.

Edit - Firestar, I think it has given the world major improvements in nuclear safety, yeah my opinion can be changed quite fast but I still do believe that have a nuclear core explode on you ain't too good. :p
 
Edit - Firestar, I think it has given the world major improvements in nuclear safety, yeah my opinion can be changed quite fast but I still do believe that have a nuclear core explode on you ain't too good. :p

Yes, it would spoil your day but multiple safety systems exist should the reactor go out of operator / safety system control, several things can be injected to make sure that should the worst happen the reactor can't go into meltdown, clearly the problem with this is thats the end of the reactor but tbh thats better than the alternative.
 
Back
Top Bottom