Personally I think the car you drive fox is better than any of the ones you listed, the build quality on all those new ones isn't as good as your E39. I also prefer the look of the E36/9 to the newer ones but thats just my personal preference.
How many of them have you driven?
Also if your starting to list fuel economy as a con fox, perhaps its time to have a derv, expecially since the performance gap is closing more and more with modern diesels.
After running the 330d for a year and realising just how economical it can be when driving carefully, I fail to see the point of the petrol equivalents. If they were noisy clattery 4-pot diesels then yes, I'd be inclined to ignore them and get the petrol, but they aren't. If I wanted a car for out and out fun then it wouldn't be a non M powered 3 or 5 series.
[TW]Fox;17049781 said:Sadly I am not like most in that I can chop and change as I see fit, once I've got something I have to hang onto it for far, far too long. Thats just me, sadly, so rather than fight that, I have to plan for that![]()
I nail a sniff over 2,500 miles each month, 55 mpg rocks my socks!
Has anybody else also found that you have to cover +30 miles for a dag-dag to have properly warmed up in order to release the high MPG?
If I do a run to Cornwall (maybe once a month) 205 miles each way – I get an average of 39mpg which is nearly all dual carriageway so it doesn't seem to make that much difference.
Any of the E92's on your list really. Then park it next to my E92 320d MSport & see who can tell the difference![]()