Starcraft - Yay or Nay

I'd say it's people like you personally - supporting a company like activision, who feel it's ok to break the game up into 3 seperate parts, each one 35 quid each.

I was always under the impression that Blizzard pretty much make all the decisions regarding any of their IP's.
 
I am not overly impressed at all really and for me the big let down are the factions.

Terran are fun to play with a few cool units but the other two faction mainly the zerg I just cant get any empathy for they just seem very boring and not as polished as terran.

It's a good game but ultimately a shallow spam fest blob rts imo.
Spam units send blob to point a rinse repeat you get the picture just like c&c 3.

There's no one unit can hold back many as in say company of heroes it's just blob vs blob or over early because of a rush.
Next game relic makes after coh online will probably be the best rts.
 
I am not overly impressed at all really and for me the big let down are the factions.

Terran are fun to play with a few cool units but the other two faction mainly the zerg I just cant get any empathy for they just seem very boring and not as polished as terran.

It's a good game but ultimately a shallow spam fest blob rts imo.
Spam units send blob to point a rinse repeat you get the picture just like c&c 3.

There's no one unit can hold back many as in say company of heroes it's just blob vs blob or over early because of a rush.
Next game relic makes after coh online will probably be the best rts.

At the lowest level it's blob vs blob yes. Nothing like that at all once you know what you're doing though.

But I guess we can't expect everyone to play long enough to be good at the game and discover the actual depth of it.
 
I have some questuions too:

1) is it a base building deal?
2) are the graphics too cartoony? They look a 'kiddie' bit from the vids ive seen.
3) is it just a case of building a million 'tanks' and zerging the enemy? every vid ive seen so far just seems to be a mass of units attacking.
 
I have some questuions too:

1) is it a base building deal?
2) are the graphics too cartoony? They look a 'kiddie' bit from the vids ive seen.
3) is it just a case of building a million 'tanks' and zerging the enemy? every vid ive seen so far just seems to be a mass of units attacking.


1. yes
2. no
3. kinda yes
 
People who "zerg" in SC or SC2 are playing on the lowest level of skill or understanding on what SC is about.

If that's the case, stick to the infinite resource maps with the "no attacks before 10 minutes" caveats then get bored after 3 games.
 
I think the game is ok, but i was hoping for something on a larger scale and maybe with squads of men rather than just training one guy at a time, basically i think if it had some elements of COH and DOW2 it would be a lot better.
 
SC1 lasted 12 years, if SC2 continues on the same path then £35 for 12 years of entertainment sounds cheap.

As for zerging and tactics and such, stop watching low level rubbish and watch some of the pro gamers, some of their battles are insanely micro intensive and even with a huge army they micro individual units during the battle and constantly act and react to everything that is happening. If you watch rubbish players then of course you will sill massing a huge army then attack-move to the enemy base.
 
What's wrong with having sequels?

Could you bend over any further?

I must say i've lost interest in the RTS genre these days. Nothing of any real interest seems to be coming out because its all dumbed down like SC2 and C&C3+. Something tells me if i did get it i'd just look back at the original and wonder what went wrong...
 
Could you bend over any further?

I must say i've lost interest in the RTS genre these days. Nothing of any real interest seems to be coming out because its all dumbed down like SC2 and C&C3+. Something tells me if i did get it i'd just look back at the original and wonder what went wrong...

Play it and find out.

What is everyone doing with their guest passes? Mine are still sitting unused in my game case
 
Could you bend over any further?

I must say i've lost interest in the RTS genre these days. Nothing of any real interest seems to be coming out because its all dumbed down like SC2 and C&C3+. Something tells me if i did get it i'd just look back at the original and wonder what went wrong...

You didn't answer the question.

Wings of Liberty has more content than Starcraft and Broodwar. When the other 2 games out there will be 3x more content than Starcraft and Broodwar. Seriously, what's wrong with that? Don't just think because they're splitting it up that we're being shafted on content. There is more content in this game than there is in the orginal PLUS expansion. I know because I recently completed SC and BW, and they're very short games.

And you're wrong about it being dumbed down. Even the Korean BW pros say it has a massive skill ceiling and will be a huge esport.
 
I think the game is ok, but i was hoping for something on a larger scale and maybe with squads of men rather than just training one guy at a time, basically i think if it had some elements of COH and DOW2 it would be a lot better.

aiiee worms, can everywhere!

i just cant get around the concept of SC2. yes its fast, its balanced, the factions have depth...

but i think tactical rts is where im at, like coh.

but if you enjoy what it provides its probably the best at it, has a big fan base and good online support.
 
I'm wanting to get this game, but I'm going to wait for the price to drop.

I mean, I'll happily shell out for a game but it has to be a game I'm 100% sure on.

I'm not 100% sure on this, so I'm going to wait.
 
I was one of the biggest critics of sc2 higher than normal price but i ended up buying it on midnight release and didnt regret it at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom