then make him come out by "talking" to him..
BUT HE COULD HAVE HAD A REALLY HARD WALKING STICK TO USE AS A WEAPON!
then make him come out by "talking" to him..
So what, the police must have said something to make him act like that. I've been stopped many times by the police, sometimes the officers are polite and everything goes fine. Sometimes they are arrogant, cocky smartarses who think cus they have a police badge means they can talk to u anyway they want.
The old man was scared after they punctured his tyres, and one of the coppers mite have been the one in the MOT incident so he might have thought they had a vendetta against him.
Although the police were a touch heavy handed, it does seem some facts are missing from that BBC item.
The police were a little OTT but the driver in question had driven away from the police in the first place, then they chased after him for 17 mins with their sirens and lights going. He didnt stop even though they were tailing him for 17 mins with the blues and twos going because he thought they were "giving him an escort home", he only came to a stop when stingers were deployed and also had an illegal licence plate. I mean lets face it, if I was in the police and some guy I had stopped drives off and then refuses to stop despite me being behind him with my lights going for almost 20 mins then I would be somewhat suspicious too
(just in case anyone wondered, this wasnt a doddering old man in a little fiesta, he was driving a £60k range rover, not that it makes a difference other than maybe the image in the readers head)
The police were still heavy handed but its not quite the clear and cut "case" that the BBC have presented.
stick to the topics and no personal comments kids, i forgot its the 6 weeks hols..
Yes but throwing stones at the car? They went too far.
Are you stupid. He obviously drove off because he thought they'd dealt with him, genuine mistake (look at how old he is) and instead of flashing him down or following him with there cars the pieces of ***** thought it was a good idea to smash his windscreen and his driver side window and then drag him out the car.
I wonder how youd feel if it was your grandad.
But I dont expect any better from you, you always defend police/government in whatever they do. If you was a german in ww2 youd try to defend the holocaust, fix up kid.
Try reading the thread before posting
Read it all, and what?
But when an officer went round to the passenger side, the car lurched forward and he was knocked over.
lol at MrLOL you know they can block off cars. They can even block off cars with bicycles when they want to...
I did find it suspicious that the article in the Metro referred to the seatbelt issue "among other offences". Clearly that covered a multitude of sins.
A disabled motorist was left terrified when police smashed his car windows and dragged him out – for driving without a seatbelt.
climbing on the bonnet of a car of someone you believe is going to drive off is a regular technique?
****ing hell surprising more of the tards don't get their brains crushed under a wheel.
Wouldn't it be easier for the police to have one of those little emergency window hammers (or a centre punch style one) than smacking at it with a baton for half an hour?
Walk up to window >tap with hammer/click with punch > window is gone.
lmao here comes helmet with the church brigade and sins. just gets better.![]()