TV licensing people are after me!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 4p
  • Start date Start date
Well at the world cup they had a converted double decker bus as a mobile studio.

Thats how it should be!

BBC should pay no expenses at all IMO.

£1000 Taxi rides? A total joke.

No expenses at all?
So you'd be happy if as part of your job you have to buy something/had an out of pocket expense and were expected to pay for it yourself? (I don't know, such as parking fees because your boss expected you to go work at a different site for 8 hours, with parking at £2-5 an hour? or drive something from site A to B via a toll road/bridge/ferry).
Fortunately HMRC has a different view...

What £1000 taxi ride?
Unless you're referring to IIRC a one of, charge for a car with driver (I believe there was one such case in the last lot of expenses) for staff whilst abroad.
From memory that was car + driver on call for something like 4 days, which would have allowed the person using it to get around an unfamiliar area, quickly, safely and arrive where needed fresh in a country that drives on the other side of the road to us.
IIRC it was someone who was out there going from meetings at odd times of the day/night on business, and travelling fairly long distances by car (in some areas that are/were near places that it's not a good idea to get lost in).

Again as an expense it can be quite reasonable, especially if that car + driver allowed the persons using it to keep working whilst on the move (oddly enough when someone is being paid a good wage it can work out much cheaper to pay for them to be driven so they can work on the move), and probably save on hotels again, not to mention car hire on it's own can be fairly expensive, let alone taxis who may/may not be available at all times, and to arrive relatively fresh at appointments and able to concentrate fully on what they are being paid to do, rather than arriving after potentially an hour+ of driving on unfamiliar roads, with local laws that you may not be fully aware of (does this area have a turn right on red rule?) and not being able to give important decisions your full attention.

Again HMRC says that's legitimate, and it's the sort of thing that from what I've heard from sources other than the Murdoch Media is extremely unusual in the BBC as they are, to coin a phrase, tighter than a ducks posterier.

It's telling that the average expenses for all the BBC top execs worked out as something like £20 a day (or was it week?), despite all their "excesses" and "partying on the tax payers money".
 
I can only assume you are posting from the offices of the BBC or work in government..

the mind boggles at how you can argue I should be force to pay for something I dont use... I want sky I pay, I want Virgin I pay, I want to rent a DVD I pay, I want a TV in my house to use any of those 3 services and I have to pay a 3rd party.... the mind boggles...

the american channels that do all the good stuff like the simpsons, 24 / lost / heros / etc etc etc do they get bollions from a tax to produce the programs?

Not at all. You forget it is a TAX.
No you do not need to pay TVL for DVDs

Think of TVL like the minimum subscription to watch any live broadcasts.
Just like Sky and virgin have their own minimum subscription which will include many channels you have no interest in. yet they still force you to pay for it, if you want to watch other channels. If you don't like it. then don't watch live broadcasts and then you don't have to pay TVL.

The commercial channels do not have a mandate to produce programs that are not all about viewer ratings.
 
vonhelmet under the Freedom of Information Act the TVLA are allowed to collect the license fee it does not mean that it's a tax.

:confused:

it is a tax and has been classified as a tax.

It is set annually by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport with the BBC responsible for collecting payment. As it is classified in law as a tax,[46] evasion is a criminal offence.
 
vonhelmet under the Freedom of Information Act the TVLA are allowed to collect the license fee it does not mean that it's a tax.

What the hell are you talking about? Do you even know what the Freedom Of Information Act is for? It's nothing to do with collecting taxes.
 
What the hell are you talking about? Do you even know what the Freedom Of Information Act is for? It's nothing to do with collecting taxes.

LOL, as someone who has done FIA publication scheme implementations, franco's post makes me giggle. :D

I used to watch a fair bit of TV, not so much recently, but even then it was all recorded, not live. I sometimes use iPlayer but only if I have to. I don't own a TV or device capable of receiving TV signals.

With all of that in mind I don't see why I should pay a TV licence and so I don't.

Not that it matters, either a previous owner of this house is still paying for it or they just ignore us, we've never received a letter about it.
 
Last edited:
This is beyond ridiculous. I wish there was a way to sticky it or have hit in huge yellow letters at the start of every TV license thread.

Step 1: Someone makes a thread kindly asking what the deal with the TV license is, often stating that they intend to watch TVCatchup or the like.

Step 2: Simultaneously, one poster will come in and say that the OP is liable for the license fee because they own equipment. Another will come along and quote the TV license website saying that the OP doesn't need to fork out

Step 3: Intense argument with neither side backing down

Step 4: Some other poster will create another thread a few months down the line with the same question, bringing us back to Step 1. The argument will continue, with the same people on either side, who will come out with the same argument and will again refuse to back down.

Can we just sticky the TV license FAQ from their website somewhere and be done with this?
 
My TV uses 1.21GW of power, so I can watch TV shows from the future.
You don't need a license for that, as it clearly states "as it is being broadcast" :D

I think we can exploit this, though by the time we've figured out a way to watch broadcasts from the future I think dodging the TV licensing guys will be the least of our worries :p
 
Back
Top Bottom