Why is Racism Unacceptable but Homophobia is Acceptable?

If people decide to be homosexual, there is no possible way they can produce offspring and therefore, they die out. Its their decision so why should they want to adopt and artificially continue their legacy?
 
It's easy to win arguments when you redefine words at will.

No he is rejecting my view totally out of hand based on scientific studies as if these are the only basis on which we can judge these things.

That is a bigot.
 
Chump, do you see me insulting you? Do I sense anger in your posts, why? Are you not confident enough in your belief that you are correct?

Sort your anger out before you post next time.

For some things scientific studies are needed and im glad scientific studies have been done on this topic but I think socially this construct is not yet acceptable and as a result the child will suffer, when the day comes that it is acceptable then fair enough.

So ginger people or those with a genetic predisposition towards obesity shouldn't be allowed to have kids as they are likely to be bullied as well?

Men can tell there sons a lot more then life then a non biological female fatherly figure...

So it's ok for 2 gay men to adopt a son then? They might even do a better job of it, being able to relate to being a man and manly things like shaving, but also being more loving/compassionate, covering the mother figure side of things.
 
But by the same logic you should view single parents in the exact same way, if the reason is purely the lack of a mother or father figure.

Do you think being a single parent is wrong?

Single parents if seperated then the father is sometimes there in the background if he's not then thats hard for him. Tough luck, he will survive as will the child adopted by homos. The only difference is the single parent child is there because of a problem, the homo adopted child is not..
 
Single parents if seperated then the father is sometimes there in the background if he's not then thats hard for him. Tough luck, he will survive as will the child adopted by homos. The only difference is the single parent child is there because of a problem, the homo adopted child is not..

So the child being in care and in need of adoption isn't a problem?
 
So ginger people or those with a genetic predisposition towards obesity shouldn't be allowed to have kids as they are likely to be bullied as well?



So it's ok for 2 gay men to adopt a son then? They might even do a better job of it, being able to relate to being a man and manly things like shaving, but also being more loving/compassionate, covering the mother figure side of things.

That's a minor thing come on, but homo adoption is not natural.

Well in the future I hope a society is in place where everyone is accepted equally regardless of there sexual preference, if a society exists where sexual preference is not really a major thing then it would be more acceptable.

As then the norms as we have known it throughout human history would have changed.
 
If people decide to be homosexual, there is no possible way they can produce offspring and therefore, they die out. Its their decision so why should they want to adopt and artificially continue their legacy?

A) You don't decide which gender you are attracted to.
B) Because their are more kids in need of loving adoptive parents than there are loving adoptive parents available.

If you think that by not letting gay couples adopt, their gayness will eventually die out, then you have my pity.
 
That's a minor thing come on, but homo adoption is not natural.

Well in the future I hope a society is in place where everyone is accepted equally regardless of there sexual preference, if a society exists where sexual preference is not really a major thing then it would be more acceptable.

As then the norms as we have known it throughout human history would have changed.

But how will the world get to that states without it becoming for common and thus accepted in the first place?

People didn't accept the notion of black people not being slaves or being allowed in to proper education until it happened, and it took time for the views to get where they needed to be.

The change has to be initiated before it can be accepted.
 
So the child being in care and in need of adoption isn't a problem?

It is a problem created by society and it needs to be sorted out. I think adopting that child would create an additional problem in our society.
 
If people decide to be homosexual, there is no possible way they can produce offspring and therefore, they die out. Its their decision so why should they want to adopt and artificially continue their legacy?

Must... resist the troll... :p
 
But how will the world get to that states without it becoming for common and thus accepted in the first place?

People didn't accept the notion of black people not being slaves or being allowed in to proper education until it happened, and it took time for the views to get where they needed to be.

The change has to be initiated before it can be accepted.

Yeah, society as a whole needs to change and advance I agree with you.
 
If people decide to be homosexual, there is no possible way they can produce offspring and therefore, they die out.

Where did the first gay come from? I don't believe for one second that gays are genetically predisposed to be gays.

I do think it is choice (whether that be conscious or not) but not genetics.
 
It is a problem created by society and it needs to be sorted out. I think adopting that child would create an additional problem in our society.

How is being brought up by 2 loving parents an additional problem in our society?

Does this hypothetical child deserve to live a life in care, never experiencing the love of a parent, regardless of sexual preference?

Cold man, cold.
 
Where did the first gay come from? I don't believe for one second that gays are genetically predisposed to be gays.

I do think it is choice (whether that be conscious or not) but not genetics.

Gilly what have you done we have been down that "choice" route.

Your going to get a tirade of abuse now.
 
Where did the first gay come from? I don't believe for one second that gays are genetically predisposed to be gays.

I do think it is choice (whether that be conscious or not) but not genetics.

If it's not a conscious choice, then you have no control over it, and thus it is not actually a choice.

You cannot control who or what you are attracted to, in the same way you cannot control what flavours you like, it is what it is.
 
Gilly what have you done we have been down that "choice" route.

Your going to get a tirade of abuse now.

I can handle that :)

If it's not a conscious choice, then you have no control over it, and thus it is not actually a choice.

You cannot control who or what you are attracted to, in the same way you cannot control what flavours you like, it is what it is.

You believe you have no control over your subconscious?

I think 2 abusive fathers is far worse than 2 abusive mothers.

I disagree.
 
How is being brought up by 2 loving parents an additional problem in our society?

Does this hypothetical child deserve to live a life in care, never experiencing the love of a parent, regardless of sexual preference?

Cold man, cold.

I've told you already why I believe it would be an additional problem, well if it's care or homo adoption I guess go for the adoption (was tempted to say care lol).
 
Gilly what have you done we have been down that "choice" route.

Your going to get a tirade of abuse now.

Yeah they're very abusive aren't they, like my mom who shouts at me when I make mess or spill something in the house.
 
I've told you already why I believe it would be an additional problem, well if it's care or homo adoption I guess go for the adoption (was tempted to say care lol).

LOL!

Why? Do you dislike gays that much? Do you actually know how rough care is on kids?

Yeah they're very abusive aren't they, like my mom who shouts at me when I make mess or spill something in the house.

Your stance reasoning becomes clearer all of a sudden :)
 
Back
Top Bottom