Outrage at Headteacher's £200k pay package

Isn't this typical BBC reporting. Headteacher earns 200k. After tax thats around 120k, so straight off the bat 80k is going back to the government coffers.

Now i dont know how much this headteacher has done compared to other headteachers, but one thing is that this isnt 200k for just being a primary school headteacher for 1 year. There is backdated pay, overtime pay etc. But what about the value back to the community that he is providing (i know this is highly debatable) but a headteacher can make a significant contribution to the wider community by helping children, especially at a primary school level.

Do i think he's worth 200k ? well i havent done enough digging to see what he has exactly achieved and what that deserves, but a salary of 200k doesn't seem overly excessive. If he has achieved something extraordinary which is an example to all headteachers, then maybe a salary of '200k' is a very good incentive for all headteachers and those that aspire to work in the educational industry.
 
why does this article cause so much consternation? Why are we prepared to see massive pay packages handed out to bankers in

Simple jealousy. Teachers are vastly underpaid for an essential role that they serve in society. As a generalisation if teachers were paid better you would attract better qualified teachers. Simples.

People justify the fact that teachers deserve "poor" pay because they "work less" no they don't. My partner is a teacher. I earn double what she does and then some and whilst I put in 50-55 hours a week at work she works equally as many if not more hours than me every week and so what if a lot of that is done at home.

Teachers have a hard time of it and I don't envy her. She wants to leave the profession as do many of her colleagues (from what she tells me) due to the poor deal they get.
 
There's just no pleasing Unions is there!

They get paid too little and they cause a fuss and threaten strikes, a member gets paid too much and they still make a fuss!

lol
 
Isn't this typical BBC reporting. Headteacher earns 200k. After tax thats around 120k, so straight off the bat 80k is going back to the government coffers.

But it would have been much cheaper and more efficient to not have collected that money, redistributed it, and collected it again, so that point is moot.
 
But it would have been much cheaper and more efficient to not have collected that money, redistributed it, and collected it again, so that point is moot.

Except then you wouldn't be able to justify the jobs of the collectors, redistributors and re-collectors ;)
 
I am still suprised that anyone with a base salary of £80k gets overtime. The last place I worked it was when you hit the 35-40k mark that overtime normally stopped.
 
so out of interst does anyone know how much the back pay was?

i keep seeing this 200k figure banded about perhaps he has been underpaid for the last 5/6 years and the bulk of that 200k is backpayments, the 200k figure is just sensasionalist headling grabbing crap.

would there be as much outrage if the headline was head teacher gets paid 83k + overtime and backdated payments? no and fwiw without living beside the school or having pupils at the school you cant say whether he's worth it or not.
 
just found it 51k in backdated pay and another 20k in overtime

not so sensational is it?

head teacher paid 83k salary plus 20k in overtime, also given 51k of money he is owed for previous work plus a bit of a bonus on top for doing a cracking job
 
Why do some people have such a problem with others being successful in this country? I don't have a problem with his pay and I certainly have no problem at all with bankers bonuses.
 
And from the facts we are given, it seems that the teacher in question has earnt every penny.

Good on him, he's shown he's good at his job, and been rewarded accordingly.

Lets take the usual tilt to football players and their wages. Do yuo honestly think that theyre £20,000 a week is well earnt compared to this head teachers £200,000?

Because I certainly dont. Im MORE than happy to see a teacher get paid for doing a good job, than sports people / bankers etc getting paid for doing nothing worthwhile.

its about supply and demand, people pay billions to watch football and buy team kit's, etc.

schools are funded by tax, so they have to run a tight ship, therefore i think £200k is excessive for a head teacher, especially when the money should be going towards the children's education, not so the teacher can buy a new house, car and a few holidays.
 
Back
Top Bottom