To pick up a point someone said earlier - we all seem to be in some form of agreement that marrying first cousins appears to be morally/genetically objectionable, therefore why isnt it illegally?
Im just wondering considering the arguments that it potentially adds costs to the NHS and that the people/communities in question dont appear to be desirable in modern society (conclusion reached if the first paragraph is correct) then making it illegal seems to offer an opportunity for higher emigration/reduced immigration of such people?
ps3ud0
Im just wondering considering the arguments that it potentially adds costs to the NHS and that the people/communities in question dont appear to be desirable in modern society (conclusion reached if the first paragraph is correct) then making it illegal seems to offer an opportunity for higher emigration/reduced immigration of such people?
ps3ud0

Last edited: