I for one would definitely go and mutilate the local farm animals if i ever visited an alien world.
Rendelsham forest is just plain spooky.
As are the cattle mutliations.
I would LOVE to know exactly what the hell is doing this to the cattle.
There have been reports of internal organs missing, but with no exit point.
Weird "laser" type cuts to the skin etc, but with no sign of burning whatsoever.
Now, Im not a UFO Fantasist, but the FACTS are that this stuff is happening, and its about time we found out what was going on, even if the explaination is military, or perfectly normal.
What amazes me is the reports of objects instantly moving vast distances in the blink of an eye.
Why doesnt half this stuff come up on radar? I thought Cheyenne mountain in the US could track something the size of a spanner orbiting around the Earth?
Thats unless these objects are materialising above the Earths surface.
The facts is that there are not facts, the use of caps does not turn a pile of badly gathered observations into solid evidence.
Only ufo vid i really went "wtf" at was that one where it appeared something was orbiting earth, then it just shoots off and what appears to be a missle of some description (more like a streak of light) comes flying to the spot where it was seconds later.
Ed: this is it
The discovery of another developed species would probably help to unify everyone on Earth in the single greatest event since the big bang. (for us).
The theory is that they could be harvesting genetic material, who knows for sure ?
On April 4, 1990, at 10:00 p.m. in the town of Petit-Rechain, a lady was walking her dog in her courtyard when she noticed the spotlights of a craft hovering above her home. She alerted her partner, who rushed outside with his newly bought camera. The camera was loaded with colour slides, but only two shots remained on the film. Leaning against the wall to avoid instability, he took two photographs, the first with a manual exposure time of one to two seconds, while the craft was banking to the left. Subsequently, it started moving and disappeared out of sight behind the nearby houses. After the film was processed, the photographer saw four light spots on one slide and nothing on the second, which he threw away.
Several weeks later, he showed the remaining photograph to his fellow metalworkers during their lunch break in the factory. One of his friends contacted a local journalist, who published the photograph in a French magazine. From there, the Belgian military academy experts were notified and requested the original slide for analysis. A team under the direction of Professor Marc Acheroy discovered that a triangular shape became visible when overexposing the slide.
After that, the original colour slide was further analyzed by Francois Louange, specialist in satellite imagery with the French national space research centre, CNES; Dr. Richard Haines, former senior scientist with NASA; and finally Professor Andre Marion, doctor in nuclear physics and professor at the University of Paris-Sud and also with CNES.
The major findings were:
- No effect of infrared radiation.
- No indication of any tampering with the slide.
- The camera was stable, but the craft was moving slowly and had approximately a 45-degree bank when the picture was taken.
- The rotation of the spotlights did not occur around one central point.
- The middle light is very different from the three other lights.
- The lights are positioned symmetrically with respect to the structure of the craft.
Many hidden elements were revealed only through the analysis of this photograph, showing that the picture was not faked. The experts noted especially that the unique characteristics of the lights are very specific and said such an effect would not occur if the picture was a hoax. Also, the findings of the experts are consistent with the account of the photographer, who initially didn't think much of his shot of four strange lights and kept it in a drawer for weeks before showing it to anyone. He was not sure what it was, and for a while had not given it much thought.
p29-31
I made a similar thread to this one about 3 or 4 years ago on OCUK. Since then, I've kept up to date with UFOs in my spare time because I do consider the question, what are they?, to be one of the most interesting mysteries of our time. I've also realised that video and photographs of UFOs are generally the worst way to approach this question, although they are a decent way to start out.
If anyone is interested, I recommend reading Leslie Kean's book 'UFOs - Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go On The Record' (2010). It's probably the best book on UFOs that has ever been made and because it just came out it's fully up to date. Despite what I've said, there are a few good pictures of UFOs for example this one:
![]()
I'll quote a bit of Kean's book regarding this photo:
It would've been quicker to get a swab, haven't they seen CSI:Mars?What ever happened to a simple tissue sample?![]()
Most books on UFO'S are crap because they treat the subject so hands on as though it is established fact that they exist.
Have you ever seen one of those books about Alien Bases on the Moon it will show you a Photograph of lots of Craters on the Moons surface and there will be an Arrow drawn in to indicate an Alien Base that Just cannot be seen.