'Civil' and 'fine' don't go together.[...]
yes, quite, thus the use of 'fine' in my post
'Civil' and 'fine' don't go together.[...]
To clarify, what do people mean by breaking their journey?
Not talking about the same thing as split ticketing? (which is totally and 100% legal as confirmed by the train companies).
Why is anyone surprised at this.
This doesn't surprise me
how is split ticketing illegal?
Breaking the journey will breach the contract - for example if you've got say a cheap ticket from major city x to major city y as part of some promotion but really just bought it because you want to get off at small town z en-route and this ticket was cheaper then you're breaching the terms and conditions of your promotional fare. Perhpas major city y is subsidising tickets to bring in more tourists or perhaps the train companies want to increase passenger numbers on certain routes...
Split ticketing - as in buying a ticket from a-b and b-c because its cheaper than buying one ticket from a-c doesn't seem to be illegal on the face of it - care to explain that one?
Surely all these people mentioned contract law are missing the point somewhat, the railways (and the penalty fair system) are governed by specific byelaws which allow these fines to be issued.
They broke the terms and conditions of the ticket. Fair play.
They broke the terms and conditions of the ticket. Fair play.
They didn't break the journey, they just got off.
It's obviously designed to stop you hopping from train to train.
It's just unenforceable nonsense, they're almost holding you hostage otherwise.