terabyte vs terabit. windows measures different to the driver manufacturers.
But what about Linux?
I thought it is all OS's
probably, ive not dont enough research to care lol.
at the end of the day, the difference is 2.4%
More like 9.9%, I get 1,863GB formatted.probably, ive not dont enough research to care lol.
at the end of the day, the difference is 2.4%
The discrepancy will be compounded as you go up in scale - 1024 is 2.4% more than 1000, but 1024x1024 (1048576) is about 4.8% more than 1000x1000, and so on.More like 9.9%, I get 1,863GB formatted.
Ubuntu has in fact recently switched to expressing gigabytes, terabytes etc in the same way as HDD manufacturers (the correct way according to the SI convention). I guess they were trying to be helpful, but it seems to have resulted in yet more confusion.But what about Linux?
I thought it is all OS's
probably, ive not dont enough research to care lol.
at the end of the day, the difference is 2.4%
It is false advertisement you spend money on a 2TB drive and yet you don't even get 1900GB.
The larger these drives are becoming the more we all lose.
Why did we even get to this?
why do I get 28gb when I format a 32gb SSD
Ubuntu has in fact recently switched to expressing gigabytes, terabytes etc in the same way as HDD manufacturers (the correct way according to the SI convention). I guess they were trying to be helpful, but it seems to have resulted in yet more confusion.![]()
or 2000 songs, 15 HD movies and **** lots of pictures
Come back to us when you've actually filled up the hard disk and need that extra bit of space and I'll try and care some more....