Poll: ****Official Battlefield Bad Company 2 Thread*****

Which type of game play would you prefer

  • Normal Rush Mode

    Votes: 481 33.4%
  • Hardcore Rush Mode

    Votes: 222 15.4%
  • Normal Conquest

    Votes: 507 35.2%
  • Hardcore Conquest

    Votes: 229 15.9%

  • Total voters
    1,439
Just come from a game with Tefal and Rifleman (Tombo) and a stats padding Admin joined. THEFUNFIGHTER69

bc2_admin_tosser.jpg


http://bfbcs.com/stats_pc/THEFUNFIGHTER69

Time:12h 10m 13s
Kills:2 312
Deaths:236
K/D Ratio:9.80

He kept teleporting people to a spot on the map and then c4'ing them, or m24'ing them or..... you get the picture. ******! I think he left with a score of 64/2
 
Last edited:
I really like Rush Mode but its getting harder & harder to find server where people are really playing to win.

Too many Snipers on attacking side = lose as they cant run down the defenders infinite ticker & are useless for taking the coms or as spawn point when they are so far away.

Too often one side or both is only interested in killing what is red to them & not taking or defending the coms & i even see people heading in the opposite direction to the coms even when its alarm is going off because they have seen the enemy elsewhere on the map & a kill is more important to them than the objectives leaving the objectives totally undefended.
 
Last edited:
Too many Snipers on attacking side = lose as they cant run down the defenders infinite ticker & are useless for taking the coms or as spawn point when they are so far away.

I do pretty well as a sniper on rush :p

sensor balls + very powerful weapon = excellent rushing unit, you're called recon for a reason you should be up front scouting the enemy.
 
Anybody noticed the increasing amount of games where people are setting C4 on the objectives and destroying them that way instead of arming the charge? I've just played a few games and before I knew it my mcoms were all blown up by people with C4 or mines. Has there been an update to this recently? I thought MCOMS were virtually immune to C4 and mines.....?????
 
Anybody noticed the increasing amount of games where people are setting C4 on the objectives and destroying them that way instead of arming the charge? I've just played a few games and before I knew it my mcoms were all blown up by people with C4 or mines. Has there been an update to this recently? I thought MCOMS were virtually immune to C4 and mines.....?????

lol, no. We normally take out points with mines/C4 but I tend to try and arm the MCOM as well. 'Q' spot, mine, arm, BOOOOM that is the normal routine.

12 mines or c4 with explosive mk2 take down an MCOM, or a few well placed C4 in a destructible building
 
Just come from a game with Tefal and Rifleman (Tombo) and a stats padding Admin joined. THEFUNFIGHTER69


http://bfbcs.com/stats_pc/THEFUNFIGHTER69

Time:12h 10m 13s
Kills:2 312
Deaths:236
K/D Ratio:9.80

He kept teleporting people to a spot on the map and then c4'ing them, or m24'ing them or..... you get the picture. ******! I think he left with a score of 64/2

Was playing on another server with a friend and that funfighter guy joined with one of his mates, blatantly hacking, virtually every kill was a head shot. Guy I was playing with reported them on the servers forums and they got banned.

Also 10 c4 with explosive damage will take out a MCOM. Also if you have 3 people, strapping C4 to the nose of a UAV works rather well for taking down MCOMs.
 
Hack tastic tonight. Don't know whats up. Teleporting and then C4'd, then killed by dudes with 60/0 kill/death ratios which always raises an eyebrow!

Not impressed :mad:
 
Yep it's rampant, had it a couple of times on the bds today. Not much can be done till they server patch it but be aware it's not admins doing it.
 
Back
Top Bottom