Dont get me started..
Go on then give us a laugh.
That is the point though, motoring are such minor offences that were it not for by-passing the judicial process the police would not bother with them otherwise.
Perhaps SINCE they are such minor offences they should not bother with them, or use the full judicial process if they feel they are an offence major enough to justify the costs.
Because they won't take a bribe
Honestly, I've dealt with a couple of decent officers, but the rest have been less than professional at times, young ones with a god-awful attitude, just hoping that I would bite and take the bait so they could do more than just a traffic ticket. The first time I was pulled over, a skin headed coppa with a gap between his teeth asks "what are you doing driving a car like this?", not the usual "is this your vehicle, sir?" that I expected.
If they used a little more discretion, instead of giving me a fixed penalty for driving through a deserted pedestrian zone in an unfamiliar town at 4am on new year's day, looking for something to eat for my smashed (pasty) girl and I, being breathalised (not a drop the whole night), then having the young officer remark "now if you were ****ed I could understand why you did that", I would probably have a little more respect for our police service.
I have to deal with the police within my job & what I don't like is you get ones that care & ones that don't.
It's just so random if they are going to solve your problem or not,
For the same crime some with what to thow the book at them while others will do all they can to get you to change your mind.
That's what I don't like about the police
While there may be something in not prosecuting minor offences it will depend how minor - what is the de minimis level? A value of £20, £50, £200, £1,000, £5,000? How do we evaluate the cost of the crime, is it purely the monetary amount to set it right if possible or some legal scale if it is not? What about the harm to society that is caused and how do you price that?
Do you suggest we don't prosecute vandals? Often their actions may result in fairly cheap clean up requirements e.g. whitewashing a wall or replanting some flowers so the cost value may be less than £100 - significantly less than any trial costs could be. If you are not in favour of vandals being ignored by the judicial process then why are you so in favour of motorists being largely exempt from it?
I've seen some absolute ****s get into the police force. A catholic fella who told me in a bar one night he would have me, my brothers and my mum, who was a prison officer at the time, shot by the provo's is now in the PSNI. That's the wonders of 50/50 enforcement.
The_Sophisticate said:Because they won't take a bribe.
I must confess to accepting a box of M&S biscuits a couple of years back when I dealt with a bag snatch from an elderleyish lady. The culprit sorted the job out, told me where the bag and items were and she was so made up when she got her things back she sent in a box of biccies with a letter of thanks to the Chief Constable.
They were bloody good bisuits as well although i did share them out with the shift.
That is quite alarming.
Is he still in ? I would hazard a guess that he will not last long.
I was going to Burnsy ... erm, but errrr never got around to it.
I wouldn't care as my old shift inspector when I first joined and who I still speak to occasionally is now head of PSD. He would have a field day.![]()