The truth about David Cameron

Child development specialists have today warned that Conservative Party leader David Cameron exhibits all the hallmarks of a violence-deprived childhood during which he may not have received the appropriate number of playground beatings for someone from his social background.
Click to expand...

Sooo... he's a double hard ********

I for one welcome our new Chuck Norris spanking leader
 
SMN said:
Lots of big words put one after another does not equal intelligence. I suspect the word you were looking for was "discrimination".
Click to expand...

Think you will find I corrected my self no more than 3 posts after. But thanks.

If the could possibly stop their priests fiddling with little boys and then stop hiding it from the police when they do and then stop pretending as if they haven't done anything wrong. Perhaps then, they may have some moral standing to go "Now, stop being nasty about us!"
Click to expand...

All muslims blow up planes, all jews are greedy, Protestants aren't happy with one wife in their life and Buddhists like to set them selves on fire.

Your right, stereotypes are fun :)
 
I expect the bullying in more select schools might come in a number of different forms. The physical side must surely still exist but I can't see it being as common as in some others across the country. Maybe, maybe not.
 
arc@css said:
I expect the bullying in more select schools might come in a number of different forms. The physical side must surely still exist but I can't see it being as common as in some others across the country. Maybe, maybe not.
Click to expand...
More buggery maybe?
 
Gornall said:
Your right, stereotypes are fun :)
Click to expand...

Except it's not a groundless stereotype, the Catholic religion on mass attempted to and still does hide the behaviour of a large number of priests from the correct authorities. It is deep rooted enough that it took 20 years for the pope to appologise and condem the acctions of the few, yet decent upstanding Muslims leaders condemed terrorists imediately.
 
a1ex2001 said:
Except it's not a groundless stereotype, the Catholic religion on mass attempted to and still does hide the behaviour of a large number of priests from the correct authorities. It is deep rooted enough that it took 20 years for the pope to appologise and condem the acctions of the few, yet decent upstanding Muslims leaders condemed terrorists imediately.
Click to expand...

Regardless, its a stereotype.

Your definition of decent upstanding muslim leaders is probably those that "do" condemn the terrorists.
 
Gornall said:
Doesn't bother me personally ...
Click to expand...

Yet you felt the need to accuse a poster making a fairly mild joke about Catholicism of 'racism'. That does seem to indicate that you're a bit sensitive about it.

As for the priests who **** kids, I don't see why the Catholic church shouldn't be mocked for that the whole episode was disgusting. IMO Religion is fair game for jokes.
 
SB118 said:
Ahh, so your definition of a decent upstanding muslim leader is one who approves of terrorism?
Click to expand...

What a twist :)

The point I was making was that these religous leaders who condemn such actions become decent upstanding leaders purely because they agree with the point being made. If they didn't they would just be religous leaders.

Yet you felt the need to accuse a poster making a fairly mild joke about Catholicism of 'racism'. That does seem to indicate that you're a bit sensitive about it.

As for the priests who **** kids, I don't see why the Catholic church shouldn't be mocked for that the whole episode was disgusting. IMO Religion is fair game for jokes.
Click to expand...

The hypocrisy bugs me, not the content.

People are very sensitive about mocking certain faiths yet others are fair game. Happens a lot.

I'm far from religous, but mocking an entire faith and essentially insulting its believers due to a scandal is fairly bad taste.
 
Hatter The Mad said:
They believe in a big man in the sky, a guy who talked to a burning bush. lol.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it makes one chuckle when you put it like. This makes me lol too...

"Apes and humans evolved from an unknown common ancestor. This ancestor split up and evolved into different species, one became erect and the other continued as it was".

"Humans didn't evolve from apes; rather, we and apes evolved from a common ancestor (who is no longer with us, we have no fossils proving this fact, but we believe it anyway".

lol :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom