The level of trolling in this thread is insane.
Where?
The level of trolling in this thread is insane.
The level of trolling in this thread is insane.
Where?
can we throw this in the mix
well if the guy is a pothead then should he be on the roads under the influence?
a danger to himself and others.
And we can tell he's a pothead because of... the massive chonging joint that is clearly visible hanging from his mouth in the video?
It's all speculation.
Long, 31, who admitted on the stand he smokes marijuana daily
just because i talk rubbish 99.99% of the time doesn't mean there isn't an element of truth in it somewhere.
did he admit that before the police pushed him off or after is the point. you can't attack somene and then find a reason afterwards
but what if the copper pushed him off for the very reason he looked doped up...bit like pulling someone over if they look drunk, well almost if you replace the blue siren with a forearm to the face.
As far as I'm aware it's not an offence to cycle while stoned, or drunk for that matter.
Then the copper wouldn't have any reason to really resign.
Come on peeps, why are you guys defending this pig thinking of all possible reasons why it wasn't an unprovoked attack by a bloody copper abusing the fact he knows the cyclist will not do anything because he is a cop.
Come on peeps, why are you guys defending this pig thinking of all possible reasons why it wasn't an unprovoked attack by a bloody copper abusing the fact he knows the cyclist will not do anything because he is a cop.
Only way to treat cyclists tbh, vermin of the roads. I regularly feel this urge as a pedestrian around London.
Come on peeps, why are you guys defending this pig thinking of all possible reasons why it wasn't an unprovoked attack by a bloody copper abusing the fact he knows the cyclist will not do anything because he is a cop.
Technically no, but you can be arrested for being drunk and disorderly and whatever the equivalent drugs charge is.
If he could get on and ride the bike, he wasn't that baked.