I think you're looking at it in a completely bizarre and biased way. Fact of the matter is regardless how good a nations Int service is, if someone wants to plan such an attack then they are clearly capable to do it, regardless of which country being targetted. The fact our intel has failed us sometimes isn't really reflective of how incapable it is, of course it will fail sometimes. You're choosing to overlook the fact that the US and UK are now more prolific targets for big terrorist attacks so threats are bound to slip through the net once in a while.
You fail to overlook how it failed, and the details around those failures.
Preventable failures, 'with no one to blame'.
It's clear that people think differently on this.
Nor am I looking at it with bias, I'm just looking at it.



