Caporegime
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 32,247
- Location
- Leafy Cheshire
We know.
I'm confused about how one of the best if not the best FWD hatchback of current times isn't fun?
A hatchback is supposed to be practical.
A French hatchback with plastic windows, scaffolding, no radio, no A/C is about as worthwhile as a handbrake on a canoe.
If it's something to be used on track, get something thats a million times better than a FWD hatch.
At the 2008 'Ten of the Best' event which has some of the countries top 4WD, FWD and RWD cars a crappy Nova on a very technical handling circuit posted a faster lap time than 13 RWD cars including
in what respect is the fn2 engine far better?
standard nova 1.1 was it?
240 brake and a screaming redline, that sounds utterly amazing for a 4 pot.
standard nova 1.1 was it?
But it's just a better engine.
They might get faster lap times, i go on track to enjoy myself, and have fun, and a RWD car such a westfield or caterham would be far more enjoyable that a peice of a **** nova.
It's not the car it's what you do with the car, even Integra's shells came in 1.6 shopping trolly form.
Just like Honda did turning the Integra shells into one of the best FWD drives ever, there is nothing stopping anyone doing something equally brilliant in any other car, including Nova's.
You are spot on....
.... as long as like honda, when you took that 1.6 integra and turned it into a 1.8 Type R you have at your disposal:
- A Multi million pound workshop
- Decades of automotive experience
- More knowledge than your average 'how to make it quicker, innit' internet guide
- A set of kenwood 6x9's![]()
[TW]Fox;17621120 said:Why?
But it's just a better engine.