Vigilante launching paedophile naming website

All the registers in the world won't stop kids being abused. I think the government are looking at revamping the sex offenders register and the crb system because it doesn't actually work.

Consider:

1) You can only ever know about people on the list - first time offenders and those never caught or registered can't be on there.
2) Someone on the list can still get a job with kids if they're prepared to lie about their name and address. I'm guessing they'd be prepared to cross that moral bridge.
3) The person most likely to abuse your children is you or another close relative, not some random who happens to live nearby.
4) The odds of any children actually being abused are tiny in comparison to other risks. It's like terrorism - more people are killed putting their trousers on than are killed by terrorists for heaven's sake.

Anyway. I have two young girls and I shan't be checking the list. I'm not scared there'll be sexually abused. They're more likely to fall down the stairs or be hit by a car. I barely even worry about those things, so why would I get into a tizz about the minute risk of them being abused?
 
Last edited:
Your a ******* heartless moron.

It's nice to see the issue of sexual assault is, as always, a topic which results in reasoned and sensible debate.

Which is the reason such a list should never exist. People cannot be trusted with it - they let the heart take over the head and think doing completely stupid things is totally acceptable. Half these people genuinelly cannot see whats wrong with brutally murdering people who touch kids.

The answer to crime is not more crime.
 
There should be no list, it just leads to violence and in nearly all cases on innocent people. they are in jail or have paid their debt.

Do you have anything to back up your claims?

Most American states/counties operate a publicly searchable sex offender registry, where it shows a map of where they are living and I've never heard of any nonces getting killed due to this (unfortunately). It's useful to know if there is a pedo living down the street if you have kids.

Example:

http://www.greenecountymo.org/sheriff/sex_offender/map.php
 
A bit worrying TBH to all those who defend the anonymity of these sick people...

Not everyone on the register is sick though!

Hell, an 18 year old having fully consensual sex with a 15 year old could result in them being put on the register... even if she was only a few days from turning 16. Is that the same thing as abusing little children?
 
A bit worrying TBH to all those who defend the anonymity of these sick people... I have an app on my iPhone (living the the USA) called Offender Locator. Type in any address and up comes the names and pics of the local paedos and the crimes they've committed.. I've not read of any revenge attacks. (which is a bit of a shame) So i don't know what all the fuss is about..

Seeing that I have 2 young children, I am very happy for the ability to know the face of the local paedo personally. Since castration isn't done, these people are never cured, and most are fanatasing about getting hold of your little one and doing all sorts of nasty things to them for their own sick pleasure.. This website is a good thing!

Are you by chance also living in the 1500s? Do you burn witches, too?
 
I wonder what percentage of peadophiles actually commit acts against children?

I wonder what percentage of normal people who fantasise about normal sex commit rape?

I wonder if these two percentages are the same?

Are there perhaps two types of peadophile?

Maybe we should admit these people to mental care rather than let local people beat them up? They are sick and should be cured.
 
Last edited:
Not everyone on the register is sick though!

Hell, an 18 year old having fully consensual sex with a 15 year old could result in them being put on the register... even if she was only a few days from turning 16. Is that the same thing as abusing little children?

Why not wait a couple of days then?
An 18 year old having sex (consentual or not) with a minor is still illegal regardless if it's only a few days, and they will be labeled a peadophile.
IMO relationships like that are wrong.

I'm biased, I have a kid sister, if she started dating an adult I'd knock him clean out for being a complete beast.

Call me a keyboard warrior if you like, I genuinely would. :)
 
[TW]Fox;17724781 said:
Because people are daft and they don't do that. They are stupid for doing this but are they really criminals?


He\She broke the law so yes..simples...that's why we have laws don't you know.
 
Why not wait a couple of days then?
An 18 year old having sex (consentual or not) with a minor is still illegal regardless if it's only a few days, and they will be labeled a peadophile.
IMO relationships like that are wrong.

I'm biased, I have a kid sister, if she started dating an adult I'd knock him clean out for being a complete beast.

Call me a keyboard warrior if you like, I genuinely would. :)

So an 18 year old dating and having sex with a 16 is perfectly above board, but if she were 15 years and 10 months, the 18 year old is sick?

:/
 
[TW]Fox;17724781 said:
Because people are daft and they don't do that. They are stupid for doing this but are they really criminals?

It's still illegal so they technically are.

I know it's not as clear cut as that, but you need to have regulations, and you need to stick to them.

(not aimed at you lol)
 
Oh quite, I dont think there is much wrong with the law as it currently stands.

But having your name on a list because aged 17 you couldnt wait a week to do your new girl at 15 years 11 months is pretty... stupid.
 
[TW]Fox;17724823 said:
Oh quite, I dont think there is much wrong with the law as it currently stands.

But having your name on a list because aged 17 you couldnt wait a week to do your new girl at 15 years 11 months is pretty... stupid.

The Law is the Law.

Yes it is silly to be put on the same register. It's how this country works. Silly.
 
Yes, but that person would end up on the register, even though they are in no way a paedophile.

But they are!
The act of paedophillia is having sex with a minor, this theoretical adult has broke that law and has fallen into the category of a peadophile.
There is no real excuse, there is a cut off and that is set at 16, not 15 and 11 months 20 days. It may seem harsh but that's the law.

EDIT: They may not be a "beast" but they certainly are a peadophile.
 
Back
Top Bottom