English League Football ** spoilers ** [6th - 10th November 2010]

lol, insulting Gustov is the new cool thing to do!

Anyway, you two. Firstly someone who is born in 1989 should know that you don't use a capital letter after a comma and deserves to be corrected on it.

Robboftwlivesontheseforums, my use of the smile was because Baz was taking the ****, I would have thought it would have been pretty obvious considering the fact that he's naming the likes of Sotirios Kyrgiakos in comparison to Chelsea missing Essien, Drogba and Lampard.
 
Last edited:
It's not so much that his team were well beaten but more to do with the fact he made a total tit of himself with his pre-game comments.

To be honest, my prediction didn't take into account that Essien / Drogba wouldn't be starting. Once I saw that Zhirkov, Kalou and Ramires were in the starting team I actually said Chelsea might lose...
 
Haha, I can see I've upset you. :D

I can only hope Chelsea lose more often so people dont have to endure your stupid attitude in here on a regular basis.
 
I can only hope Chelsea lose more often so people dont have to endure your stupid attitude in here on a regular basis.

You mean win not lose? Fail. Why would my attitude be better when Chelsea lose? Or are you suggesting I don't visit the forums when Chelsea lose because I'm such a glory hunter?

For the record, I was posting in the football forums a long time before you.
 
You mean win not lose? Fail.

No, I mean lose. You dont tend to post much when they lose (except on the odd occasion like today), when they win you just post the odd snide remark to try and wind people up, thats pretty easy to ignore.

For the record, I was posting in the football forums a long time before you.

What does that have to do with anything? :confused:
 
Robboftwlivesontheseforums, my use of the smile was because Baz was taking the ****, I would have thought it would have been pretty obvious considering the fact that he's naming the likes of Sotirios Kyrgiakos in comparison to Chelsea missing Essien, Drogba and Lampard.

Soto's been Liverpool's best player so far this season, in comparison Lampard has barely played a game and Essien's hardly set the world alight. We were without at least 3 of our first 11, as were you (well 1 was on the bench for you).

A weakened Liverpool side beat a weakened Chelsea side, comfortably :)
To be honest, my prediction didn't take into account that Essien / Drogba wouldn't be starting. Once I saw that Zhirkov, Kalou and Ramires were in the starting team I actually said Chelsea might lose...

No you didn't.
Only thing I'm happy about with the Chelsea team is the back 4 and goalkeeper.

Essien, Lampard and Drogba are probably Chelsea's best 3 players. (alongside A.Cole)

Saw the first half performance vs Napoli mid-week though and Liverpool looked absolutely terrible so I'm still expecting 3 points.
 
No, I mean lose. You dont tend to post much when they lose (except on the odd occasion like today), when they win you just post the odd snide remark to try and wind people up, thats pretty easy to ignore.

Once again, what are you basing this on? Chelsea have lost twice this season. How could you possibly know if I visit the forums if Chelsea win / lose , do you have a special notebook with my name on it?

What does that have to do with anything? :confused:

Because you are talking about me being in here on a 'regular basis.' Why do you think?
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to go all the way back through the thread to find where I stated that Chelsea might lose...yes, before the game I made the prediction that Chelsea would win, they didn't. As already said, it's called a prediction.
 
We were without at least 3 of our first 11, as were you (well 1 was on the bench for you).

A weakened Liverpool side beat a weakened Chelsea side, comfortably :)


No you didn't.

lol you were actually being serious. Delusional Liverpool fans are delusional.

But yes, I 100% agree with you. Liverpool missing J.Cole, Agger and Soto is equivalent to Chelsea missing Drogba, Essien and Lampard.
 
Last edited:
Because you are talking about me being in here on a 'regular basis' why do you think?

I didn't mention a period of time, did I?

I noticed last season you generally only popped up in here occasionally when Chelsea won.

Anyway, we shouldn't derail the thread any more. Its not the end of the world either way :)
 
Delusional Liverpool fans are delusional.

While we're on the subject could someone please explain to me the origin of this? I've never seen it on any other forum, yet it's rife here. People making sentences with the same first and last word, most commonly manifested it seems as, "Ironic thread is ironic". I'm obviously missing something, so why do people do it? Why not just say, "Liverpool fans are delusional."?
 
While we're on the subject could someone please explain to me the origin of this? I've never seen it on any other forum, yet it's rife here. People making sentences with the same first and last word, most commonly manifested it seems as, "Ironic thread is ironic". I'm obviously missing something, so why do people do it? Why not just say, "Liverpool fans are delusional."?

Its just an internet thing, its all over the place.
 
I didn't mention a period of time, did I?

I noticed last season you generally only popped up in here occasionally when Chelsea won.

No you didn't, you're making assumptions. I'd much rather be in here occasionally than have almost 8k posts since Jan 2009.

Don't be bitter Gussy. This is an important lesson for you. If you don't like the **** coming your way, learn to tone down the attitude before the game :)

It wasn't attitude, it was a prediction. You're the one being childish rubbing the result in my face and trying to get a reaction because my prediction was wrong.

Ever think that, you know, when so many people are doing it, it might just be a problem with you than every one of them?

Just throwing that out there...

No, the problem is that they are predominantly fans of the opposition team and therefore obviously aren't going to share my opinions.
 
Last edited:
No you didn't, you're making assumptions. I'd much rather be in here occasionally than have almost 8k posts since Jan 2009.

What is your point?

I have 11 posts per day on average, does that signify something? That I spend my entire life on here?

Um, no, it doesn't really does it.
 
What is your point?

I have 11 posts per day on average, does that signify something? That I spend my entire life on here?

Um, no, it doesn't really does it.

You're a difficult one. My point, is that you have no idea if I only visit the forums when Chelsea win, it's just an assumption you've made.
 
Back
Top Bottom