COD Black Ops looks pretty good on PC

James J said:
Can we have a poll attached to this thread please asking if its worth buying or not? 82 pages is quite hard to follow for peoples actual likes and dislikes due to how many bugs seem to be present in it lol.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't know how to vote in a poll. I think it is mediocre in many ways and it has lots of bugs. But nonetheless I have got some enjoyment from the MP because in spite of everything, the basic CoD gameplay is still there, and it is therefore somewhat fun. Whether you should buy it or not, I can't say. I would probably still have bought it even knowing what I know now, just to see for myself first hand.
 
dirtydog said:
I wouldn't know how to vote in a poll. I think it is mediocre in many ways and it has lots of bugs. But nonetheless I have got some enjoyment from the MP because in spite of everything, the basic CoD gameplay is still there, and it is therefore somewhat fun. Whether you should buy it or not, I can't say. I would probably still have bought it even knowing what I know now, just to see for myself first hand.
Click to expand...

I probably will end up buying it just like I did with MW2. I did enjoy the multiplayer on MW2 and the single player also even though a lot of others absolutely hated the game. The only thing I have against the franchise is the price. I bought RE5 for £17.99 on release and numerous other titles at the same or even less that that, making £39.99 extremely steep lol.
 
Looks like more and more companies/games developers are relying on a game's previous popularity to continue making less and less quality & quantity add-ons/followups that are simply trying to milk the cow dry. Yet people still keep buying them and the games companies/developers keep smiling all the way to the bank instead of spending time & money on improving/making the games what they suppose to play/look like.

I wonder how much long the gamers of the world will put up with this or perhaps most gamers do have a money tree in their garden and do not care on what they spend their money on?

For many years games have needed an ESRB rating system, why not have one for the quality of the actual game itself, so at least the buyer is more aware of what they are about to spend their money on?
 
Last edited:
Soya said:
Looks like more and more companies/games developers are relying on a game's previous popularity to continue making less and less quality & quantity add-ons/followups that simply is trying to milk the cow dry, yet people still keep buying them and they keep smiling all the way to the bank instead of spending time & money on improving/making the games what they suppose to play/look like.

I wonder how long the gamers of the world will put up with this or perhaps most do have a money tree in their garden and do not care on what they spend their money on?

You, for many years games have needed an ESRB rating system, why not have one for the quality of the actual game itself, so at least the buyer is more aware of what they are about to spend their money on?
Click to expand...

I agree with this and for the later point you made I personally use METAcritic scoring on steam as justification for purchases as its normally a very good tool to see if a game is crap or not lol
 
Can anyone see if they can find my server in the server list? It's got about 15 people in it :confused:

It's called Benjo derp
 
well what can i say the game is awesome now

the framerate is fixed so now i can crank the graphics up to the max and with 8xAA it looks good and is smooth as butter

and without the lag we can all now finally see how good it is compared to MW2

i wonder what the moaners have to say now :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom