Surprised you haven't got a man for that![]()
Even the servants need time off at christmas, its very irritating i dont mind telling you

Surprised you haven't got a man for that![]()
Even the servants need time off at christmas, its very irritating i dont mind telling you![]()
You'll be telling us that you pay them next....
[TW]Fox;17950477 said:I was disputing the claim that there was £3k in it, not that there was £1k in it.
But yes, lets buy it anyway so you can spend a month taking it to bits with half a car shell on your drive picking bits off it in the cold with a Haynes manual (OH wait there isnt one for this car).
My mistake, its a legendary idea!
Why not start up a business breaking the plethora of 500-900 quid E38's on Autotrader if you are so confident that they've all got so much money in them? You could give up your day job and become.. A scrap man.
[TW]Fox;17951372 said:Because the reward must be greater than the risk. The risk of an ancient 750i is far bigger than the reward, and the chances of failure are huge, so why bother?
Too many people take on cars they can't handle because they can afford to buy them, assuming it wont go wrong, and then wonder what to do when it does.
I like to try and be a voice of reason
If you've got loads of cash then it doesnt matter, you can afford to fix this sort of car anyway. But usually the people in threads I go worst case in do not have loads of money, they are normally scraping around amongst the sediment at the bottom of whatever pond of car it is they are trying to buy - for these people a huge bill would be quite a blow. Therefore why take it on?*
*Talking more generally now rather than this specific car.
It's a sad paradox with older complex cars. The people who can afford to take a gamble don't want to because they can afford to just buy a better one. So the people who can't afford to just buy a better one are the ones taking a gamble on the shabby ones and these are the ones with the most to lose..
We didnt win the war with that attitude my boy, he who dares wins![]()
[TW]Fox;17951372 said:Because the reward must be greater than the risk. The risk of an ancient 750i is far bigger than the reward, and the chances of failure are huge, so why bother?
Too many people take on cars they can't handle because they can afford to buy them, assuming it wont go wrong, and then wonder what to do when it does.
I like to try and be a voice of reason
If you've got loads of cash then it doesnt matter, you can afford to fix this sort of car anyway. But usually the people in threads I go worst case in do not have loads of money, they are normally scraping around amongst the sediment at the bottom of whatever pond of car it is they are trying to buy - for these people a huge bill would be quite a blow. Therefore why take it on?*
*Talking more generally now rather than this specific car.
It's a sad paradox with older complex cars. The people who can afford to take a gamble don't want to because they can afford to just buy a better one. So the people who can't afford to just buy a better one are the ones taking a gamble on the shabby ones and these are the ones with the most to lose..
Do you really mean pointless? That implies that every other car class has no point exsisting and all cars should logically be this class.
A supermini isn't pointless as the point is to offer much cheaper motoring on a budget.
I suspect you meant something different but the way it came across implies you literally cannot see any reason why people buy anything other than limo size cars![]()
We didnt win the war with that attitude my boy, he who dares wins![]()
Who??
I'd rater look for something like a Monaro that won't cost the earth to service and keep running!
Well puff my pipe and warm my slippers![]()
Guilty![]()
We didnt win the war with that attitude my boy, he who dares wins![]()
Ironic that comment as many a German fighter was powered by BMW engines.![]()