Not quite - their site was hosted with Amazons distributed/cloud servers and they pulled the plug for breaching TOS/government pressure.
Besides, it isn't anon (cf. IRC).
Is that a question.What is this amazon you speak of.
What is this amazon you speak of.
What is this amazon you speak of.
The minute people begin to be inconvenienced by actions related to Wikileaks is the time when any public support they have will begin to disappear....
The crackers/hackers or cyber-terrorists/freedom fighters or whatever you wish to call them will only hurt wikileaks in the long run.
They would be better off targeting .gov sites.
Who would notice if they targeted gov sites?
The media for a start, especially if it were something high profile.
The media for a start, especially if it were something high profile.
Wasn't the WikiLeaks idiots trying to crash it the other day?