Christian assemblies in schools could face axe over claims they infringe children's human rights
- Thread starter Metatron
- Start date
- Status
Even though I don't agree with Christianity and that it's mainly served it's purpose I don't think we should ban all schools from having this, If you send your kid to school and then don't tell them at home that they don't have to beleive it and they have their own thoughts then it's soley the responsibility of the parents.
I have Christian and catholic friends and I don't tell them that what they beleive in is based on fiction nor fact then I wouldn't have any friends.
All I can go on is what I experienced as a kid, and that was having a laugh and making rude noises when assemblies took place, didn't affect me at all.
Legal evidence ... what the hell is legal evidence?
Same for personal evidence?
But we are not talking about proof that you love your family, we are talking about convincing me that you love them... there is a huge difference between proof of something, and a human being (and we are fallible) accepting something
No you just carried on your problems from previous threads & have a problem with my previous posts to you, My first post on here had nothing to do with you yet you attacked me despite your claims you only attacked me in response. how pathetic are you to keep cred on here???
Last edited:
Witness statements are typically the key elements of evidence, yes,
Again, we are not talking about a court case here though, or people's personal views or convincing some one
We are talking about PROOF that God exists, which would be a some sort of scientific theory that explains God.
Last edited:
I said I based my tongue in cheek comment on your past posting history on the relevant subjects, not that I wished to continue some argument from a previous thread.
As you your question, Get a life?, I don't need another, but thanks for asking.
But how I feel towards my family is evidence to me that I do love my family (I guess that was the point I was trying to make).
I'm sure it wouldn't do a very good job of convincing you no, but it is evidence from a certain perspective.
Isn't legal evidence kind of based on scientific?
Take the relevant bits, put them together and figure out what happened/what is happening.
You can test for 'love'. We are just chemical reactions people...
No, it's predominantly witness statements that are used for a trial judge to decide the factual issues (person X said Y on the phone...).
No you just carried on your problems from previous threads
post244 said:
I see no reference to any previous disagreement from another thread. I gave you the benefit of the doubt regarding your intentions in your first post, you decided to continue your diatribe. I think the problem may be yours.
Last edited:
The very most you could be correct is that there might be certain chemical balances that give an indication of affection.
As of yet it certainly couldn't be done, and even then it wouldn't be 'proof'.
If you can, then I'm not sure anyone's done it yet.
Why?
Science doesn't care about god. In fact, depending on your definition of God, scientific theory could be applied to prove of God...
for example if God was in fact the Universe and that the Universe was "aware" then Science could indeed be proving 'God' as we speak...
Again rypt go learn what science is.
Here are lots of deffinitions of prove, just because it is not scientific proof does nit make it useless, t just useless with in the scientific frame work, which at the end of the day is a predictive model and doesn't prove anything.
Here are lots of deffinitions of prove, just because it is not scientific proof does nit make it useless, t just useless with in the scientific frame work, which at the end of the day is a predictive model and doesn't prove anything.
Only if the existence is scientifically testable.
- Status