I haven't actually done anything other than argue pointlessly with you. If you feel intimidated by a question on your intentions or the use of the word "loosely" I fail to see how that breaks forum protocol.
Last edited:
Christian assemblies in schools could face axe over claims they infringe children's human rights
- Thread starter Metatron
- Start date
- Status
I haven't actually done anything other than argue pointlessly with you. If you feel intimidated by a question on your intentions or the use of the word "loosely" I fail to see how that breaks forum protocol.
Dunno about the Daily Mail readers hopes though....
I also got another red card for calling someone stupid. But looking at your posts, not only are you being confrontational with threats/sorry posts of what am I going to do about what you posted but you are also deciding you can assume & make a mockery that perhaps I need psychological help. Kinda makes me calling someone stupid "in passing jest" not that big a deal for which I was "punished".
I never did anything wrong either....just apparently went over the borderlines. I don't even know why you can still post.
Last edited:
Then don't jump in & argue pointlessly with me. You did afterall jump in..despite claiming you only answer back. (all there in black & white..where you born an idiot???)
Go figure....*shrugs*
I only ever answered back to you personally. I did not initiate any conversation with you.
My original post wasn't arguing with you only stating my opinion of your intentions in a tongue in cheek manner to another poster and not you personally. That doesn't constitute 'jumping in' either as I was already present in the Thread.
(It's 'were', not 'where'. It's always best to get these things right when calling people 'idiots')
Last edited:
Is that so. You only ever answer back to me right??? . However, if suddenly you have it pointed out to you that you did in fact start a "war" first, then that's different, it was tongue in cheek. Somehow, no matter how many times I read it, I can not for the life of me see your response to the first post I made on here as being merely tongue in cheek. I don't care personally, just don't make yourself out to be a saint with every excuse you can find along the way.
I haven't started a 'war', The post was quite obviously humorous in nature, that you took it seriously would suppose that you would have responded by pointing out my error with a justification. I even stated as much on several occasions, including actually taking your post seriously as you asked and gave you a serious answer (the aforementioned post #244), which you repeatedly ignored in favour of being abusive instead.
As I said, you are entitled to your views, I am equally entitled to mine.
Now if you want to continue trolling along fine, but if you are serious about your intentions then you will take my explanation as genuine and respond to the post I made when you asked me to take yours seriously and without any bigoted intent.
Last edited:
For asterix sake, tell it to someone who cares.
What have the Gauls got to do with it....
That's enough for me to shake hands. & move on.
Agreed.
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,917
- Location
- Merseyside. UK
Can any of us say that this is good for kids?
I think we are at the point (or should i say, past the point) of religion having any real relevance in our lives. I don't get my morals from religion and we all know right from wrong. If there is a god he's going to have to do the one thing that would convince everyone! SHOW HIMSELF TO ALL.
I think we are at the point (or should i say, past the point) of religion having any real relevance in our lives. I don't get my morals from religion and we all know right from wrong. If there is a god he's going to have to do the one thing that would convince everyone! SHOW HIMSELF TO ALL.
- Status