I'm just talking about the way I used overdose when I explained what a whitey was.
Question about the misuse of drugs act.
- Thread starter Jonny ///M
- Start date
I'm just talking about the way I used overdose when I explained what a whitey was.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2004
- Posts
- 25,821
- Location
- Glasgow
Out of interest then could you overdose by eating it? It's got little to do with the debate or whether it can harm you but I'm curious.
If you mean me, then yes I do. It's what the word means.
I highly doubt your body could metabolise it quick enough, not to mention the fact that you probably couldn't actually eat the quantity required.
So in theory, I imagine its more "likely" to do it through ingesting than smoking, yes.
You most certainly could. And unlike smoking where a lethal or even very dangerous overdose is unlikely, by eating it there's vitrtually no limit to consumption, so it's very like the drinking vodka and dying in your sleep example.
No. I wouldn't use it in that context.
Are you arging what the word means? Are you now telling me that I cannot say an overdose is what the dictionary says it is?
All overdose means is too much. I overdosed on pro plus and couldn't get to sleep. I overdosed on herion and nearly died. I overdosed on alcohol and woke up on the kitchen floor. I overdosed on hash and spewed my ring.
Calm yourself, you took my original out of context/misquoted or whatever, and I responded in the same vein as my original post. Thanks for the laugh, yes it is embarrassing, but I'll get over it.
I am fully aware that the toxic dose of THC is impossibly high.
Regardless, I would regard vomiting as a negative health status/impact on my body. I am far to sensible/health consciousD) to put anything in my body in such levels that it would cause a medical overdose.
I apologise, I shouldn't have laughed, I've been trying to be on my best behaviour for this thread.
I wasn't laughing that you did it (we all do it from time to time), just that you class it as an overdose, which in literal terms would be correct but as I explained in a previous post, it is not what I would deem an overdose, that would just be over doing it.
Since when can you be searched because you look dodgy?
what's wrong with cannabis you nazi?
The law is morally correct, it cannot be challenged. You're pretty much committing treason if you even dare to question...
... the law.
what's wrong with cannabis you nazi?
The law is morally correct, it cannot be challenged. You're pretty much committing treason if you even dare to question...
... the law.
I was just simply stating that you would no more say that you had "overdosed" on cannabis that you would say that you had "overdosed" after a heavy drinking session (unless you actually drunk such a large amount that you required medical intervention through fear of death)
It is not the correct terminology.
It is not the correct terminology.
Last edited:
Depends what you measure GOOD as. I could measure good as having a good time and not bothering about the day after blues. Also, not many drugs are really that harmful if taken in small amount every now and then. Our body doesn't simply omgwtfdie if we have some drugs in it every now and then, the body is a remarkable thing and can recover easily from intake every now and then. It gets serious when you do it day in day out, this is why I believe they are illegal. Take moral views and what you have been brought up on out of the equations and base it solely on science, a molecular structure goes into your body changes some things around, effect wears off, things that changed change back to normal and that's it. If you do it all the time you start to get problems.
Last edited:
The police aren't there to make the law, or to interpret it. So, it doesn't really matter what the police think.
quite, but unfortunately they do enforce those laws and prosecute, penalise and imprision as a result of breaking them.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 4,533
- Location
- UK
Unfortunately the fourth amendment doesn't apply over here
