I don't want a job

Does this mea there's less competition for me? but meh, don't think they add much to the competition anyways :o

Hes just plain ol' lazy...
 
We just advertsied in a national recruitment paper recently for people who can spare a few hours per week working from home in a franchise agreement for an online sales company and didn't get one single caller!

Literally, a few hours per week, no outlays, no hard work, earn between £100 and £300 per week and no one came forward - can't believe no one wanted a job. Easy money.

Go on then, what did it involve?
 
Scum.

What employer would even take him?

He makes it perfectly clear at the interviews that he doesn't want a job so they never offer him a job.
Mate had someone turn up for an interview who said that they only turned up because the Jobcentre made them and that they didn't want a job. Mate grassed them up and had a right go at the Jobcentre for wasting his time :D.
 
We just advertsied in a national recruitment paper recently for people who can spare a few hours per week working from home in a franchise agreement for an online sales company and didn't get one single caller!

Literally, a few hours per week, no outlays, no hard work, earn between £100 and £300 per week and no one came forward - can't believe no one wanted a job. Easy money.

Sorry to say but people see this type of thing and automatically think "con" as most of them are.
 
Unless the government set aside some land for people such as him to live freely it's the least they owe him.

It's not really a choice to work if the only alternative is to roam the streets and not be allowed to settle anywhere, how is that any different from the old slave trade where masters told their slaves that they could leave but would lose their benefits given to them as slaves if they did (place to live/food etc)?

The fact is if this guy stopped claiming dole as everybody wants, built a home, allotment and lived entirely independently the government would soon come along and bulldoze it all, even if he was "contributing to society" by selling food he grew to local shops the government would soon stop him.

That's a strawman, and the point is completely disingenuous. This man has no intention of doing *anything*, let alone building a home and creating an allotment... not sure where you got those ideas from. :confused:

In this country you have a decent quality, free education system up to the age of 18. There is no reason for anyone to be unemployable, unless they have a disability, illness or condition that prevents it. We should have a support system for people that fall on hard times, and for people that are transiently out of work, but long term unemployment supported by the state should not be a career choice.
 
IMO someone should come for him in the night, he could disappear and wake up in the middle of the desert in a work camp of some description. I'm pretty sure he owes this country 2 years of 65 quid a week, thats £6760, so on minimum wage that means he owes us at least 1100 hours of work. That should be his punishment. Let him come back when he's ready to get a job and be a responsible member of society, if he still intends to sponge, send him back again.
 
If he's happy on £65 a week... he wouldn't have to work for long would he? If he was smart he could easily earn that from home too.

I think that may be the problem here......


To those who say you cant kick him out on the streets if there are kids involved, what was adoption invented for?
 
I find it hard to be particularly angry at this guy, he's not taking something I want (I don't want to exist on £65). Compare that to bankers who suck up millions and don't require a tenth of that to have a great life.
Like depressed people he's got to a level where he is just existing, which is pretty sad really.

Personally I blame the fixation that somehow 'other people' are responsible for giving you a job.
If you want to set up your own business and do something for yourself, you have to jump through no end of hoops just to be legal. If you want to employ somebody else to help then it's a nightmare of paperwork.

Basically we are being coerced into being spoonfed all our working lives, when we should be free to make money wherever there are opportunities.

Say I wanted to give somebody 30 hours work, they'd have to declare all that and fill in a zillion forms. Basically there is no incentive out there for making your life better through work.
 
Basically he has to choices.Stay on the dole..Go hungry and cold and get into debt,or work Go hungry and cold and get into debt.
Its not that benefits are an attractive lifestyle choice,Its just that work in the UK for most is an even worse choice.
The governments only answer is to say you will be better of in work,but there solution is not to make work pay more,just make benefits pay less!
And in any case even if he works its the taxpayer which will be paying most of his wages via tax credits and other top up benefits.
Years of corporate lobbying have seen to that.
The question we should be asking can we afford to give him a job?
 
Unless the government set aside some land (as with the native American Indian reservations in the USA) for people such as him to live freely it's the least they owe him.

It's not really a choice to work if the only alternative is to roam the streets and not be allowed to settle anywhere, how is that any different from the old slave trade where masters told their slaves that they could leave but would lose their benefits given to them as slaves if they did (place to live/food etc)?

The fact is if this guy stopped claiming dole as everybody wants, built a home, allotment and lived entirely independently the government would soon come along and bulldoze it all, even if he was "contributing to society" by selling food he grew to local shops the government would soon stop him.
classic, you are owned till the day you die, ain't that the truth:)
 
Basically he has two choices.
Stay on the dole, go hungry and cold and get into debt, or work

It's not that benefits are an attractive lifestyle choice, it's just that work in the UK for most is an even worse choice. The governments only answer is to say you will be better off in work, but their solution is not to make work pay more, just make benefits pay less!

In any case even if he works it's the taxpayer which will be paying most of his wages via tax credits and other top up benefits, years of corporate lobbying have seen to that.

The question we should be asking is can we afford to give him a job?

fixed

god you are annoying
 
I've a really simple answer
every time they go to pickup their dole cheque they get given a task (pain this wall etc) once they have done it to the satisfaction of the guy in the job center then they can have their money AND NOT BEFORE
would mean REALLY clean streets and nice freshly painted walls everywhere
I'm sure I can find LOADS of places where they need windows cleaning or bins emptying or maybe some animals mucked out etc.
 
We just advertsied in a national recruitment paper recently for people who can spare a few hours per week working from home in a franchise agreement for an online sales company and didn't get one single caller!

Literally, a few hours per week, no outlays, no hard work, earn between £100 and £300 per week and no one came forward - can't believe no one wanted a job. Easy money.

go on then, what is it?
 
Yep forward em the details of this job please if its serious I have spare hours that sounds interesting. As long as its no Cold calling.
 
Back
Top Bottom