[TW]Fox;18522396 said:Just because you lack the capacity to comprehend something does not make it pointless.
I Lol'd
[TW]Fox;18522396 said:Just because you lack the capacity to comprehend something does not make it pointless.
The Gov want to know what boiler you have.
So you tell them you have x boiler.
Gov get back to you and tell you your boiler in old and is inefficient, so replace it and we can help you pay for it.
Me, I know that I keep getting info from my gas supplier with the same info you have just told me.
So the question is still pointless
[TW]Fox;18522396 said:1 How do they know to offer you information and support if they dont know your boiler model is inefficient?
2 How would you know yourself based on usage, do you know whats efficient and what isnt?
3 Just because you lack the capacity to comprehend something does not make it pointless.
1. old boiler = not efficient
2. My boiler is new, so I know its efficient
3. Typical keyboard warrior, remark
[TW]Fox;18522542 said:Well done you. There are 60m other people in this country though, not just you.
I haven't been provided with any information by my gas supplier about getting a more efficient boiler...Your gas supplier, gives you info about more efficient boilers, and how to pay for it.
So the Gov do not need to ask that question in a census?
Your gas supplier, gives you info about more efficient boilers, and how to pay for it.
So the Gov do not need to ask that question in a census?
The Gov want to know what boiler you have.
So you tell them you have x boiler.
Gov get back to you and tell you your boiler in old and is inefficient, so replace it and we can help you pay for it.
Me, I know that I keep getting info from my gas supplier with the same info you have just told me.
So the question is still pointless
It will be up to you to come to them after the scheme has started and say you have that boiler, the data is anonymised before it's analysed by politicians.
Your gas supplier, gives you info about more efficient boilers, and how to pay for it.
So the Gov do not need to ask that question in a census?
Furthermore, a lot of the questions seem to be totally unrelated to mapping out the population.
As to why I object to the involvement of Lockheed Martin, it is for much the same reason as I object to wholesale privatisation and our turning the financial and intellectual future of the UK over to whoever happens to have the money but absolutely 0% interest in the people of the UK other than as a commodity. The fact that Lockheed Martin is a major US Government contractor is the icing on the cake.
Your gas supplier, gives you info about more efficient boilers, and how to pay for it.
So the Gov do not need to ask that question in a census?
[TW]Fox;18522307 said:But the Census is there to give the government information, its no good you knowing you've got an inefficient boiler if the government doesn't know and therefore cannot do anything about it![]()
Most importantly they can weigh up options such as LPG ports, importing gas, building power stations - or in the short term would a campaign of grant funded home improvements work out cheaper?
I'll never understand people who hate things like the census. Do you really have that much to hide?