Timber versus concrete floors.
Timber floors require a simpler set of skills and can be easily modified on site. Properly sourced timber is quite environmentally sound. Timber enables easier service runs through the property. Timber is relatively light for manual handling. Timber can be treated to provide a rot free design life for an average dwelling.
The main problem with newer timber construction is the lightness due to higher design stresses used. This leads to noisier floors. The adoption of flooring panels rather than boards and improved nailing means that it is difficult to access services under the floor.
Concrete, whether cast in situ or precast has a higher energy input to fabricate, cement and steel. Cast in situ requires falsework and formwork, precast requires formwork in the factory. Transport costs are higher due to weight. Generally a higher level of supervision and testing is required. A delay would be required to allow strength to develop. Services are ducted and require planning. The mass reduces noise and loss of heat in a dwelling. Underfloor heating is possible with concrete floors.
Of the two if I had a choice, I would prefer concrete for all floors in a house but that would increase costs. I am a civil design engineer.
Timber floors require a simpler set of skills and can be easily modified on site. Properly sourced timber is quite environmentally sound. Timber enables easier service runs through the property. Timber is relatively light for manual handling. Timber can be treated to provide a rot free design life for an average dwelling.
The main problem with newer timber construction is the lightness due to higher design stresses used. This leads to noisier floors. The adoption of flooring panels rather than boards and improved nailing means that it is difficult to access services under the floor.
Concrete, whether cast in situ or precast has a higher energy input to fabricate, cement and steel. Cast in situ requires falsework and formwork, precast requires formwork in the factory. Transport costs are higher due to weight. Generally a higher level of supervision and testing is required. A delay would be required to allow strength to develop. Services are ducted and require planning. The mass reduces noise and loss of heat in a dwelling. Underfloor heating is possible with concrete floors.
Of the two if I had a choice, I would prefer concrete for all floors in a house but that would increase costs. I am a civil design engineer.